Changeset: b0bfa441d70f
Author:mullan
Date: 2012-08-02 10:40 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/b0bfa441d70f
7026347: Certificate and X509CRL should have verify(PublicKey key, Provider
sigProvider)
Reviewed-by: mullan, xuelei, weijun
Contributed-by: jason...@orac
Hi Christian,
Probably best to discuss this on the net-dev@openjdk.java.net list (cc'd).
Two comments from me (I'm not on net-dev):
1. CHECK_NULL does a return so you will be leaving the monitor locked if
you encounter any nulls.
2. Is it simpler to add synchronization at the Java level? (I
Thanks for the cross post David. Yes, net-dev is the best place to
discuss this issue ( bcc'ing off jdk7u-dev ).
Thanks for reporting this issue Christian. I haven't looked at the
proposed patch yet, but I agree we may want to simplify this if possible
( handling the synchronization at the Jav
- Original Message -
> Thanks for the cross post David. Yes, net-dev is the best place to
> discuss this issue ( bcc'ing off jdk7u-dev ).
>
> Thanks for reporting this issue Christian. I haven't looked at the
> proposed patch yet, but I agree we may want to simplify this if
> possible
> (
Changeset: 8a82e5f9c47f
Author:dmocek
Date: 2012-08-02 18:12 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/8a82e5f9c47f
7187876: ClassCastException in TCPTransport.executeAcceptLoop
Reviewed-by: dholmes, smarks
! src/share/classes/sun/rmi/transport/tcp/TCPTransport.java
Am 08/02/12 17:27, schrieb Chris Hegarty:
Thanks for the cross post David. Yes, net-dev is the best place to
discuss this issue ( bcc'ing off jdk7u-dev ).
Thanks for reporting this issue Christian. I haven't looked at the
proposed patch yet, but I agree we may want to simplify this if possible
(
