Re: java.net.NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces does not work properly on AIX with IPv6

2011-10-19 Thread Steve Poole
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 15:14 +0800, Jonathan Lu wrote: > Hi net-devs, > > I've got a problem on AIX operating system when IPv6 is enabled,which > can be easily reproduced by attached test case NetworkInterfaceTest.java. > On AIX paltform, the /proc file system behaves differently from Linux, > so

Re: java.net.NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces does not work properly on AIX with IPv6

2011-10-19 Thread Steve Poole
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 15:14 +0800, Jonathan Lu wrote: > Hi net-devs, > > I've got a problem on AIX operating system when IPv6 is enabled,which > can be easily reproduced by attached test case NetworkInterfaceTest.java. > On AIX paltform, the /proc file system behaves differently from Linux, > so

Re: java.net.NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces does not work properly on AIX with IPv6

2011-10-19 Thread Alan Bateman
Steve Poole wrote: : Hi - another thought. If this patch is about dealing with the fact that there is no /proc/net on AIX isn't that true for Solaris as well? (my Solaris box doesn't have a /proc/net folder either) I wonder if we have patch here that should either be made to work for Solaris

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 2 new changesets

2011-10-19 Thread sean . mullan
Changeset: 57eb9136b73b Author:mullan Date: 2011-10-19 10:15 -0400 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/57eb9136b73b 7102686: Restructure timestamp code so that jars and modules can more easily share the same code Reviewed-by: mchung ! src/share/classes/sun/security/pkc

Review problemlist.txt

2011-10-19 Thread Michael McMahon
Hi, We have a few test failures on the nightly test run. So, I'd like to move them on to the problem list pending investigation. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/7102665/webrev.1/ Thanks, Michael

Re: Review problemlist.txt

2011-10-19 Thread Chris Hegarty
Michael, Kurchi, java/net/DatagramSocket/ChangingAddress.java was added recently in JDK8, see CR 7084030. Looking at it again I'm not sure if the test makes sense, or at least we would have to loosen its restrictions so much that it wouldn't be testing anything useful ( or the crooks of the or

Re: Review problemlist.txt

2011-10-19 Thread Kurchi Subhra Hazra
That is fine with me. Thanks, Kurchi On 10/19/11 8:48 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote: Michael, Kurchi, java/net/DatagramSocket/ChangingAddress.java was added recently in JDK8, see CR 7084030. Looking at it again I'm not sure if the test makes sense, or at least we would have to loosen its restricti

Re: Review problemlist.txt

2011-10-19 Thread Kurchi Subhra Hazra
That is fine with me. Can I remove the test as a part of fixing 7102704? Thanks, Kurchi On 10/19/11 8:48 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote: Michael, Kurchi, java/net/DatagramSocket/ChangingAddress.java was added recently in JDK8, see CR 7084030. Looking at it again I'm not sure if the test makes sense

Re: Review problemlist.txt

2011-10-19 Thread Chris Hegarty
On 19/10/2011 16:49, Kurchi Subhra Hazra wrote: That is fine with me. Can I remove the test as a part of fixing 7102704? Sounds good to me. The problem is that we can't be sure what local address will be returned on a dual stack system, other than one of the local addresses. Which doesn't se

hg: jdk8/tl/langtools: 7102515: javac running very very long and not returning

2011-10-19 Thread maurizio . cimadamore
Changeset: 366c233eb838 Author:mcimadamore Date: 2011-10-19 16:56 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/366c233eb838 7102515: javac running very very long and not returning Summary: Verbose resolution diagnostics slow down with operator resolution Reviewed-by:

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 5029031: Add Collections.checkedQueue()

2011-10-19 Thread mike . duigou
Changeset: c5c91589b126 Author:mduigou Date: 2011-10-19 14:17 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/c5c91589b126 5029031: Add Collections.checkedQueue() Reviewed-by: mduigou Contributed-by: darryl.mo...@oracle.com ! src/share/classes/java/util/Collections.java + tes

hg: jdk8/tl/langtools: 7101146: Paths should more directly managed by BaseFileManager

2011-10-19 Thread jonathan . gibbons
Changeset: d2cbb77469ed Author:jjg Date: 2011-10-19 15:29 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/d2cbb77469ed 7101146: Paths should more directly managed by BaseFileManager Reviewed-by: mcimadamore ! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/file/JavacFileManager.j

Re: java.net.NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces does not work properly on AIX with IPv6

2011-10-19 Thread Jonathan Lu
On 10/19/2011 06:03 PM, Steve Poole wrote: On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 15:14 +0800, Jonathan Lu wrote: Hi net-devs, I've got a problem on AIX operating system when IPv6 is enabled,which can be easily reproduced by attached test case NetworkInterfaceTest.java. On AIX paltform, the /proc file system be

Re: java.net.NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces does not work properly on AIX with IPv6

2011-10-19 Thread Steve Poole
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 13:24 +0800, Jonathan Lu wrote: > On 10/19/2011 06:03 PM, Steve Poole wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 15:14 +0800, Jonathan Lu wrote: > >> Hi net-devs, > >> > >> I've got a problem on AIX operating system when IPv6 is enabled,which > >> can be easily reproduced by attached te

Re: java.net.NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces does not work properly on AIX with IPv6

2011-10-19 Thread Jonathan Lu
On 10/20/2011 01:24 PM, Jonathan Lu wrote: On 10/19/2011 06:03 PM, Steve Poole wrote: On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 15:14 +0800, Jonathan Lu wrote: Hi net-devs, I've got a problem on AIX operating system when IPv6 is enabled,which can be easily reproduced by attached test case NetworkInterfaceTest.ja