Hi Christopher,
> The bug I filed against this issue is 6615656. It has not reached our
> external bug interface yet, but should do so in the next few days. When
> it does it will be reachable at:
>http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6615656
Great, thanks.
> On another note, thanks you
Hi Roman,
The bug I filed against this issue is 6615656. It has not reached our
external bug interface yet, but should do so in the next few days. When
it does it will be reachable at:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6615656
On another note, thanks you for the contribution. I have no
Hi,
> >https://sca.dev.java.net/CA_signatories.htm
>
> I already signed the agreement. You should find my name in the proper
> list (can't find the URL right now, but I'm sure you know it).
Duh. I should actually follow the link you posted :-) My assignment is
under aicas GmbH (the company I
Forwarding this mail to the core libs mailing list as they are most
probably in a better position to answer it as they own the sun.rmi package.
-Chris.
Original Message
Subject: Strange problem w/ RMI HTTP to CGI socket factory
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:57:48 -0400
From: Sarel
Hi Roman,
I have reviewed your proposed changes and they look fine. I agree that
both java.net.NetworkInterface.getSubnet0 and
java.net.NetworkInterface.getBroadcast0 are unimplemented and should
also be removed.
We should be able to remove these NetworkInterface methods under CR
6615656 als
Yes, I see that you are already signed up.
I will proceed to review your fix and will be in contact shortly.
Regards,
-Chris.
Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi Richard, Michael,
Some clarifications on UriBuilder, URI templates and URI processing in
JSR-311.
UriBuilder is primarily concerned about making easy to safely and
efficiently build URIs. It was designed to be general in nature rather
than scoped to a certain way in JS
Hi Richard, Michael,
Some clarifications on UriBuilder, URI templates and URI processing in
JSR-311.
UriBuilder is primarily concerned about making easy to safely and
efficiently build URIs. It was designed to be general in nature rather
than scoped to a certain way in JSR-311. If it is at a
Paul,
> [UriBuilder has] 4 methods associated with accessing URI templates of
a class or method, but it is simple to generalize by removing such methods
This seems a good starting point. If I may propose a logical progression:
1. We split JSR311's UriBuilder into a JSR311-specific version and
On Oct 12, 2007, at 6:31 PM, Richard Kennard wrote:
> [UriBuilder has] 4 methods associated with accessing URI
templates of a class or method, but it is simple to generalize by
removing such methods
This seems a good starting point. If I may propose a logical
progression:
1. We split J
Marc,
Thanks for your reply.
> The JSR 311 UriBuilder has methods for scheme, host, port and
userInfo. We did have authority too but removed it since its a composite
of some of the others.
Right, sorry - I missed those when I was looking at the JavaDoc.
> I think it would make sense for the
11 matches
Mail list logo
