Hi Sherman,
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 08:42 -0800, Xueming Shen wrote:
> No, you did not miss anything. The "original patch proposal " had not
> been sent to
> any of the community mailing lists, the "reviewed-by" is for the final
> code review,
> which was not sent to the mailing list as well, I
Hi Mark,
No, you did not miss anything. The "original patch proposal " had not
been sent to
any of the community mailing lists, the "reviewed-by" is for the final
code review,
which was not sent to the mailing list as well, I don't think we send
each/every code
review request out, especiall
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 06:57 +, xueming.s...@sun.com wrote:
> Changeset: 57dc40ece164
> Author:sherman
> Date: 2008-12-17 22:50 -0800
> URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/57dc40ece164
>
> 6496274: jar seems to use more CPU than it should
> Summary: boost jar cre
Changeset: 57dc40ece164
Author:sherman
Date: 2008-12-17 22:50 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/57dc40ece164
6496274: jar seems to use more CPU than it should
Summary: boost jar creating performance especially for the large jar file
Reviewed-by: martin
! src/sha
