Weijun Wang wrote:
The internal structure of NTLMAuthentication is changed and that's why
I changed the serialVersionUid as well. If unchanged, I guess the old
serialized form can still be accepted by the new class, but all new
field will become null/0. After the change, any such deserializatio
The internal structure of NTLMAuthentication is changed and that's why I
changed the serialVersionUid as well. If unchanged, I guess the old
serialized form can still be accepted by the new class, but all new
field will become null/0. After the change, any such deserialization
should throw a ex
Why is the serialVersionUid changed in NTLMAuthentication?
Otherwise, the encapsulation of NTLM in the new API looks quite
concise and neat to me? Looks fine.
- Michael
Vincent Ryan wrote:
The SASL component looks good Max.
Michael/Chris: have you any comments on the NTLM changes?
On 25/0
The SASL component looks good Max.
Michael/Chris: have you any comments on the NTLM changes?
On 25/08/2010 06:23, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Ping again.
>
> The webrev is updated:
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/6911951/webrev.01/
>
> The CCC is about to be finalized:
>http://ccc.sfbay.
Ping again.
The webrev is updated:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/6911951/webrev.01/
The CCC is about to be finalized:
http://ccc.sfbay.sun.com/6911951
Thanks
Max
On 04/16/2010 11:12 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Vinnie
Please take a review on this webrev:
cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun
