Re: Request to backport 6644726

2011-02-15 Thread Chris Hegarty
On 02/14/11 05:46 PM, Joe Darcy wrote: Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote: On 11:35 Fri 11 Feb , Joe Darcy wrote: Networking team, Any comments on backporting this change to OpenJDK 6? My inclination is to approve the backport, but I want your input on the issue. -Joe On 2/8/2011 1:19 AM, Florian W

Re: Request to backport 6644726

2011-02-14 Thread Joe Darcy
Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote: On 11:35 Fri 11 Feb , Joe Darcy wrote: Networking team, Any comments on backporting this change to OpenJDK 6? My inclination is to approve the backport, but I want your input on the issue. -Joe On 2/8/2011 1:19 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: [sni

Re: Request to backport 6644726

2011-02-14 Thread Dr Andrew John Hughes
On 11:35 Fri 11 Feb , Joe Darcy wrote: > Networking team, > > Any comments on backporting this change to OpenJDK 6? My inclination is > to approve the backport, but I want your input on the issue. > > -Joe > > On 2/8/2011 1:19 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > This change: > > > > # User jccol

Re: Request to backport 6644726

2011-02-11 Thread Joe Darcy
Networking team, Any comments on backporting this change to OpenJDK 6? My inclination is to approve the backport, but I want your input on the issue. -Joe On 2/8/2011 1:19 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: This change: # User jccollet # Date 1208423133 -7200 # Node ID d44e3bf49ffbcbc5c6ce9a8fa4113