For the record, this issue is tracked by 8158519 [1], and discussion will
continue
on another thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2016-June/009885.html
-Chris.
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158519
> On 30 May 2016, at 13:51, Doychin Bondzhev wrote:
>
> At
Attached is the diff file
--
Doychin Bondzhev
dSoft-Bulgaria Ltd.
PowerPro - billing & provisioning solution for Service providers
PowerStor - Warehouse & POS
http://www.dsoft-bg.com/
Mobile: +359888243116
diff -r e17beec1b64f src/java.base/unix/native/libnet/NetworkInterface.c
--- a/src/java.ba
Doychin,
Apologies, I am having issues accessing that URL, can you please
post the output of 'hg diff' to this list, and I will examine
your proposed patch.
-Chris.
On 29/05/16 21:30, Doychin Bondzhev wrote:
Hi guys,
here is an updated webrev against current NetworkInterface.c
http://downloa
Hi guys,
here is an updated webrev against current NetworkInterface.c
http://downloads.dsoft-bg.com/networkInterface/webrev/
--
Doychin Bondzhev
dSoft-Bulgaria Ltd.
PowerPro - billing & provisioning solution for Service providers
PowerStor - Warehouse & POS
http://www.dsoft-bg.com/
Mobile: +359
@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Reminder about reported problem in NetworkInterface.c
Hi,
Here is a link to the original message I send in 2015 whit deception and link
to the patch:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2015-January/008829.html
The patch is based on the NetworkInterface.c code
> On 26 May 2016, at 15:04, Doychin Bondzhev wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is a link to the original message I send in 2015 whit deception and link
> to the patch:
>
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2015-January/008829.html
>
> The patch is based on the NetworkInterface.c code at
Hi,
Here is a link to the original message I send in 2015 whit deception and
link to the patch:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2015-January/008829.html
The patch is based on the NetworkInterface.c code at that time.
If it is needed I can update it against current code.
Have a n
> On 26 May 2016, at 13:57, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
>
>> On 26 May 2016, at 13:46, Doychin Bondzhev wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I have my signed Oca processed. I hope now we can continue with
>> proposed patch?
>
> I cannot find you on
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html#lis
> On 26 May 2016, at 13:46, Doychin Bondzhev wrote:
>
> Hi, I have my signed Oca processed. I hope now we can continue with proposed
> patch?
I cannot find you on
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html#list
Please confirm your that you are on this list.
Chris.
Hi, I have my signed Oca processed. I hope now we can continue with
proposed patch?
On May 12, 2016 14:18, "Ivan St. Ivanov" wrote:
> Hello Alan,
>
> If that is the showstopper for moving this change forward, Doychin is part
> of the Bulgarian JUG. Which has signed the OCA. I talked to him and h
On 12.05.2016 13:18, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote:
Hello Alan,
If that is the showstopper for moving this change forward,
Quoting from the very first step of the OpenJDK contribution guide at
http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
"If you haven't yet signed the Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA) th
Hello Alan,
If that is the showstopper for moving this change forward, Doychin is part
of the Bulgarian JUG. Which has signed the OCA. I talked to him and he is
fine to let his change pass through JUG's account.
Regards,
Ivan
On May 12, 2016 13:32, "Alan Bateman" wrote:
>
>
> On 12/05/2016 11:2
On 12/05/2016 11:25, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi Doychin,
thanks for pointing me to this. I was already looking at that part of the code
and know about some gaps. So I'll take this item and open a bug and work on
integrating the proposed change.
I don't see Doychin on the of OCA signatorie
ix for Bug 8156521 has to be finished and pushed.
Best regards
Christoph
> -Original Message-
> From: net-dev [mailto:net-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of
> Doychin Bondzhev
> Sent: Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2016 12:19
> To: net-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Remind
Hi, guys
I see that some of you is working on NetworkInterface.c file.
Just posting this to remind that there is a problem in
NetworkInterface.c when scanning network interfaces on Linux platform.
Here is the initial report from January 2015.
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/20
15 matches
Mail list logo
