Yes, that would make sense indeed.
I guess they are referring to the undesirable expansion on the array
as opposed to say ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException.
Thanks a lot for the clarification.
Alex.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> On 03/ 8/11 06:25 PM, Alex Lam S.L. wrot
On 03/ 8/11 06:25 PM, Alex Lam S.L. wrote:
Under ForkJoinPool.java:
* readers must tolerate null slots. To avoid flailing during
should it be "failing" (extraneous "l")?
I actually flagged this in my original review, but put it aside as I
guessed it was kinda correct. The array is sized larg
Under ForkJoinPool.java:
* readers must tolerate null slots. To avoid flailing during
should it be "failing" (extraneous "l")?
Alex.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:17 PM, wrote:
> Changeset: 63509149c027
> Author: dl
> Date: 2011-03-08 18:16 +
> URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/