On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 10:18 AM Alan Bateman
wrote:
Yes, URL is really old and much of its legacy behavior cannot be changed
> for compatibility reasons. At some point I think all of its constructors
> need to be deprecated. So if you are making changes to URL then assume
> it will require a lot
On 22/01/2021 08:46, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
Given that this class is @since 1.0 there is probably some resistance
to changing behaviour in this area?
Yes, URL is really old and much of its legacy behavior cannot be changed
for compatibility reasons. At some point I think all of its construct
