On 19/10/2011 16:49, Kurchi Subhra Hazra wrote:
That is fine with me. Can I remove the test as a part of fixing 7102704?
Sounds good to me.
The problem is that we can't be sure what local address will be returned
on a dual stack system, other than one of the local addresses. Which
doesn't se
That is fine with me. Can I remove the test as a part of fixing 7102704?
Thanks,
Kurchi
On 10/19/11 8:48 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Michael, Kurchi,
java/net/DatagramSocket/ChangingAddress.java was added recently in
JDK8, see CR 7084030. Looking at it again I'm not sure if the test
makes sense
That is fine with me.
Thanks,
Kurchi
On 10/19/11 8:48 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Michael, Kurchi,
java/net/DatagramSocket/ChangingAddress.java was added recently in
JDK8, see CR 7084030. Looking at it again I'm not sure if the test
makes sense, or at least we would have to loosen its restricti
Michael, Kurchi,
java/net/DatagramSocket/ChangingAddress.java was added recently in JDK8,
see CR 7084030. Looking at it again I'm not sure if the test makes
sense, or at least we would have to loosen its restrictions so much that
it wouldn't be testing anything useful ( or the crooks of the or
