Re: Re: New candidate JEP: 408: Simple Web Server

2021-04-08 Thread Zheka Kozlov
Can we put at least new classes to some java.* package (SimpleFileServer, HttpHandlers, Request)? For example, java.net.httpserver. вт, 30 мар. 2021 г. в 20:14, Julia Boes : > Hi Krzysztof, > > Is there a plan to change the package name? > I always thought that com.sun.* package was for old inter

Re: [External] : Re: Re: New candidate JEP: 408: Simple Web Server

2021-04-06 Thread Alan Bateman
On 06/04/2021 11:25, Julia Boes wrote: : The new classes extend/implement/build upon the existing abstractions in jdk.httpserver, they have a clear API relationship and cannot be easily separated out. Indeed, separating them out would make things much more confusing, given they are a logical exte

Re: [External] : Re: Re: New candidate JEP: 408: Simple Web Server

2021-04-06 Thread Julia Boes
Hi Zheka, On 05/04/2021 16:09, Zheka Kozlov wrote: > Can we put at least new classes to some java.* package (SimpleFileServer, > HttpHandlers, Request)? For example, java.net.httpserver. The new classes extend/implement/build upon the existing abstractions in jdk.httpserver, they have a clear AP

Re: Re: New candidate JEP: 408: Simple Web Server

2021-03-30 Thread Julia Boes
Hi Krzysztof, Is there a plan to change the package name? I always thought that com.sun.* package was for old internal code and I assume I'm not the only one. the simple server builds on the existing API in the com.sun.net.httpserver package, which was added in JDK 1.6. At that time, the conven