reinstated the old test.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jzavgren/7188517/webrev.03/
John
- Original Message -
From: chris.hega...@oracle.com
To: john.zavg...@oracle.com
Cc: kurchi.subhra.ha...@oracle.com, net-dev@openjdk.java.net
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 4:39:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re:
-- Original Message -
From: chris.hega...@oracle.com
To: john.zavg...@oracle.com
Cc: kurchi.subhra.ha...@oracle.com, net-dev@openjdk.java.net
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 4:39:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: RFR JDK7188517
John,
I think you can simply reinstate
http://hg.openj
racle.com
Cc: kurchi.subhra.ha...@oracle.com, net-dev@openjdk.java.net
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 4:39:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: RFR JDK7188517
John,
I think you can simply reinstate
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/diff/7bd32bfc0539/test/java/net/CookieHandler/TestH
On 15/05/2013 13:02, Chris Hegarty wrote:
I believe the reviews on the open list are complete. The CCC has been
accepted, nut it needs to be make final, then the CCC committee need to
vote again.
I did send mail to you about making it final ( one step process ), but
you may not have seen it
g...@oracle.com
Cc: kurchi.subhra.ha...@oracle.com, net-dev@openjdk.java.net
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 4:39:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: RFR JDK7188517
John,
I think you can simply reinstate
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/diff/7bd32bfc0539/test/java/ne
.@oracle.com
Cc: kurchi.subhra.ha...@oracle.com, net-dev@openjdk.java.net
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 4:39:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: RFR JDK7188517
John,
I think you can simply reinstate
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/diff/7bd32bfc0539/test/java/net/CookieHandler/TestHttpCook
ginal Message -
> From: chris.hega...@oracle.com
> To: john.zavg...@oracle.com
> Cc: kurchi.subhra.ha...@oracle.com, net-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 4:39:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: RFR JDK7188517
>
> John,
>
> I think you can simp
://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jzavgren/7188517/webrev.03/
John
- Original Message -
From: chris.hega...@oracle.com
To: john.zavg...@oracle.com
Cc: kurchi.subhra.ha...@oracle.com, net-dev@openjdk.java.net
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 4:39:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: RFR JDK7188517
...@oracle.com, net-dev@openjdk.java.net
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 4:39:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: RFR JDK7188517
John,
I think you can simply reinstate
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/diff/7bd32bfc0539/test/java/net/CookieHandler/TestHttpCookie.java
-Chris.
On 05/08
AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: RFR JDK7188517
John,
I think you can simply reinstate
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/diff/7bd32bfc0539/test/java/net/CookieHandler/TestHttpCookie.java
-Chris.
On 05/08/2013 09:02 PM, Kurchi Hazra wrote:
> I would have thrown an except
John,
I think you can simply reinstate
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/diff/7bd32bfc0539/test/java/net/CookieHandler/TestHttpCookie.java
-Chris.
On 05/08/2013 09:02 PM, Kurchi Hazra wrote:
I would have thrown an exception if the IllegalArgumentException is not
obtained, otherwise the
I would have thrown an exception if the IllegalArgumentException is not
obtained, otherwise the test looses its
purpose, and will pass silently if someone mistakenly removes the $
check in our code.
- Kurchi
On 5/8/2013 12:10 PM, John Zavgren wrote:
Greetings:
I added a test for the leading
Greetings:
I added a test for the leading dollar sign character in cookie names:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jzavgren/7188517/webrev.03/
Thanks!
John
On 05/08/2013 08:33 AM, Michael McMahon wrote:
On 08/05/13 09:50, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 08/05/2013 10:35, Michael McMahon wrote:
On 07/05/1
On 08/05/13 09:50, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 08/05/2013 10:35, Michael McMahon wrote:
On 07/05/13 14:43, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 05/06/2013 10:28 PM, Kurchi Hazra wrote:
This looks okay to me.
Source changes look fine to me too. Probably best to add a test for '$'
In fact, Michael actually re
On 08/05/2013 10:35, Michael McMahon wrote:
On 07/05/13 14:43, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 05/06/2013 10:28 PM, Kurchi Hazra wrote:
This looks okay to me.
Source changes look fine to me too. Probably best to add a test for '$'
In fact, Michael actually removed such a test [1] during another
chan
On 07/05/13 14:43, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 05/06/2013 10:28 PM, Kurchi Hazra wrote:
This looks okay to me.
Source changes look fine to me too. Probably best to add a test for '$'
In fact, Michael actually removed such a test [1] during another
change. We should get positive agreement from Mi
On 05/06/2013 10:28 PM, Kurchi Hazra wrote:
This looks okay to me.
Source changes look fine to me too. Probably best to add a test for '$'
In fact, Michael actually removed such a test [1] during another change.
We should get positive agreement from Michael before pushing this.
-Chris.
[1]
This looks okay to me.
- Kurchi
On 5/2/2013 10:09 AM, John Zavgren wrote:
All:
My original email was mangled by my email program (stbeehive/zimbra)
... so I'm sending a second correctly formatted copy.
I'm sorry for the inconvenience.
John
---
Please consider the following cha
All:
My original email was mangled by my email program (stbeehive/zimbra) ... so I'm
sending a second correctly formatted copy.
I'm sorry for the inconvenience.
John
---
Please consider the following change to the cookie constructor:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jzavgren/71
19 matches
Mail list logo