> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my changes (and CSR) to drop support for pre JDK
> 1.4 `DatagramSocketImpl` implementations?
>
> These changes propose to drop support for `DatagramSocketImpls` that were
> compiled with JDK 1.3 or older, which do not have support for connected
> sockets,
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:47:44 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could someone please review my changes (and CSR) to drop support for pre JDK
>> 1.4 `DatagramSocketImpl` implementations?
>>
>> These changes propose to drop support for `DatagramSocketImpls` that were
>> compiled with J
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my changes (and CSR) to drop support for pre JDK
> 1.4 `DatagramSocketImpl` implementations?
>
> These changes propose to drop support for `DatagramSocketImpls` that were
> compiled with JDK 1.3 or older, which do not have support for connected
> sockets,
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:41:30 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could someone please review my changes (and CSR) to drop support for pre JDK
>> 1.4 `DatagramSocketImpl` implementations?
>>
>> These changes propose to drop support for `DatagramSocketImpls` that were
>> compiled with J
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:41:30 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could someone please review my changes (and CSR) to drop support for pre JDK
>> 1.4 `DatagramSocketImpl` implementations?
>>
>> These changes propose to drop support for `DatagramSocketImpls` that were
>> compiled with J
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:15:55 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/net/DatagramSocketImpl.java line 105:
>>
>>> 103: *
>>> 104: * @implSpec the default implementation of this method always
>>> throws {@code SocketException}
>>> 105: *
>>
>> The implementat
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:20:01 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains three additional
>> c
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 07:10:56 GMT, Vyom Tewari wrote:
>> Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains three additional
>> co
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my changes (and CSR) to drop support for pre JDK
> 1.4 `DatagramSocketImpl` implementations?
>
> These changes propose to drop support for `DatagramSocketImpls` that were
> compiled with JDK 1.3 or older, which do not have support for connected
> sockets,
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:42:12 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my changes (and CSR) to drop support for pre JDK
> 1.4 `DatagramSocketImpl` implementations?
>
> These changes propose to drop support for `DatagramSocketImpls` that were
> compiled with JDK 1.3
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:12:51 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could someone please review my changes (and CSR) to drop support for pre JDK
>> 1.4 `DatagramSocketImpl` implementations?
>>
>> These changes propose to drop support for `DatagramSocketImpls` that were
>> compiled with JDK 1.3
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:42:12 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my changes (and CSR) to drop support for pre JDK
> 1.4 `DatagramSocketImpl` implementations?
>
> These changes propose to drop support for `DatagramSocketImpls` that were
> compiled with JDK 1.3
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:42:12 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my changes (and CSR) to drop support for pre JDK
> 1.4 `DatagramSocketImpl` implementations?
>
> These changes propose to drop support for `DatagramSocketImpls` that were
> compiled with JDK 1.3
13 matches
Mail list logo
