On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:53:14 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> Minor spec changes from spec approved in initial CSR
>
> Michael McMahon has updated the pull request incrementally with two
> additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - update from Alan's comment Nov 17
> - minor change sugge
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:25:22 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Michael McMahon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional
>> comm
> Minor spec changes from spec approved in initial CSR
Michael McMahon has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
- update from Alan's comment Nov 17
- minor change suggested by Daniel
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.ja
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:29:26 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> Minor spec changes from spec approved in initial CSR
>
> Michael McMahon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
> brought in by the merge/
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:42:02 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Michael McMahon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional
>> comm
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:29:26 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> Minor spec changes from spec approved in initial CSR
>
> Michael McMahon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
> brought in by the merge/
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:32:28 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> The clarification to the SecurityException looks good.
>
> The API docs specify that bind(null) will "bind to an automatically assigned
> socket address". Would it be better to lead with that phrase in the
> properties doc rather than swi
> Minor spec changes from spec approved in initial CSR
Michael McMahon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional
commits since th
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 14:53:16 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Minor spec changes from spec approved in initial CSR
>
> Marked as reviewed by dfuchs (Reviewer).
The clarification to the SecurityException looks good.
The API docs specify that bind(null) will "bind to an automatically assigned
socket a
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 22:04:56 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
> Minor spec changes from spec approved in initial CSR
Marked as reviewed by dfuchs (Reviewer).
src/java.base/share/classes/java/net/doc-files/net-properties.html line 250:
> 248: Automatic binding of a server socket occurs when {@link
>
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 09:29:54 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> No, an empty path signifies an unnamed address and only client sockets
>> (SocketChannels) are allowed to be unnamed.
>
> You get a BindException if you try to bind a ServerSocketChannel to the
> unnamed address. But, the exception mess
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 09:25:52 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/net/doc-files/net-properties.html line 250:
>>
>>> 248: Automatic binding of a server socket occurs when {@link
>>> 249: java.nio.channels.ServerSocketChannel#bind(SocketAddress,int)
>>> ServerSocketCha
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 09:09:18 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Minor spec changes from spec approved in initial CSR
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/net/doc-files/net-properties.html line 246:
>
>> 244: Unix domain sockets
>> 245: There are a number of system (and networking) properties that affect
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 09:21:05 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/net/doc-files/net-properties.html line 246:
>>
>>> 244: Unix domain sockets
>>> 245: There are a number of system (and networking) properties that
>>> affect the behavior of
>>> 246: channels to Unix dom
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 09:42:05 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> I'm not sure, as the system properties don't affect implicit binding, but I
>> would have liked to have a place to "explain" all aspects of binding of Unix
>> domain sockets/server-sockets. Maybe, I could add a paragraph at the end,
>> ju
15 matches
Mail list logo
