ok, thanks; +1
(Determining method level thread safety without per method documentation
is a bit of a chore).
On 6/3/2016 11:08 AM, Michael McMahon wrote:
Hi Roger,
All access to the list is synchronized.
Yes, I should also remove that printf. It's not required.
Pavel also suggested chan
Hi Roger,
All access to the list is synchronized.
Yes, I should also remove that printf. It's not required.
Pavel also suggested changing the LinkedList to an ArrayList
when I told him the size is nearly always small (1 or 2 elements).
So, I will also change that.
Thanks
Michael.
On 03/06/16
Hi Michael,
Looks ok as long as the response_cfs list can't be shrunk by a different
thread. (cfs_len can be stale).
And 577: probably a printf to system.err isn't the ultimate in
robustness or debugging.
Roger
On 6/3/2016 10:40 AM, Michael McMahon wrote:
Could I get the following sma
