> On 19 Oct 2016, at 16:29, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>
> Thanks Roger!
>
> On 19/10/16 16:01, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> looks fine.
>>
>> (The style differences are disconcerting but are consistent within the
>> file).
>
> Yes. I preserved the original style though it was hurting
> m
> On Oct 19, 2016, at 7:52 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please find below a patch that updates jdk.httpserver to use
> System.Logger.
>
> As a result jdk.httpserver no longer requires java.logging.
>
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8157965/webrev.00
> issue: https:/
Looks good Daniel.
Thanks,
Michael
On 19/10/2016, 15:52, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi,
Please find below a patch that updates jdk.httpserver to use
System.Logger.
As a result jdk.httpserver no longer requires java.logging.
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8157965/webrev.00
issue:
Thanks Roger!
On 19/10/16 16:01, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Daniel,
looks fine.
(The style differences are disconcerting but are consistent within the
file).
Yes. I preserved the original style though it was hurting
my eyes ;-) Having a mixed style was much worse.
best regards,
-- daniel
Rog
Hi Daniel,
looks fine.
(The style differences are disconcerting but are consistent within the
file).
Roger
On 10/19/2016 10:52 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi,
Please find below a patch that updates jdk.httpserver to use
System.Logger.
As a result jdk.httpserver no longer requires java.loggin
