Re: RFR: 8036979: Support java.net.SocketOption<> in java.net socket types

2014-04-09 Thread Michael McMahon
Thanks Alan. All comments accepted, except as clarified below. Michael On 09/04/14 15:07, Alan Bateman wrote: On 08/04/2014 18:49, Michael McMahon wrote: Could I get the following reviewed please? In addition to providing generic support for java.net.SocketOption, it also includes 8032808, wh

Re: RFR: 8036979: Support java.net.SocketOption<> in java.net socket types

2014-04-09 Thread Michael McMahon
Thanks Chris. Michael. On 09/04/14 13:34, Chris Hegarty wrote: This is a nice addition, and looks very good to me. Just a few small comments: 1) SocketImpl getOption/setOption need javadoc to describe how they can throw IOException. Maybe even the same, of similar javdoc to the socket t

Re: RFR: 8036979: Support java.net.SocketOption<> in java.net socket types

2014-04-09 Thread Alan Bateman
On 08/04/2014 18:49, Michael McMahon wrote: Could I get the following reviewed please? In addition to providing generic support for java.net.SocketOption, it also includes 8032808, which implements a platform specific socket option SO_FLOW_SLA (in jdk.net) There are changes to two repos: http:

Re: RFR: 8036979: Support java.net.SocketOption<> in java.net socket types

2014-04-09 Thread Chris Hegarty
This is a nice addition, and looks very good to me. Just a few small comments: 1) SocketImpl getOption/setOption need javadoc to describe how they can throw IOException. Maybe even the same, of similar javdoc to the socket type equivalent methods? 2) New protected methods in SocketImpl ne