Just a quick summary on where we are on this effort.
I've submitted the JEP [1] so it can be considered for the roadmap.
There wasn't any additional feedback from the draft that I sent here in
February.
In the mean-time, the "preparatory" changes have been pushed to jdk/jdk:
JDK-8220493: Pre
Just another update on the effort to replace the legacy PlainSocketImpl.
The changes in the sandbox are in good shape. I spent a bit of time
comparing the behavior differences between the old and new
implementations and I haven't found anything significant so far. Sergey
Kuksenko has improved t
On 25/01/2019 14:08, Alan Bateman wrote:
I've created a branch in the sandbox, named "niosocketimpl-branch",
with a prototype SocketImpl implementation based on the infrastructure
in sun.nio.ch package that supports the NIO channel implementations.
The branch also includes the changes to java
On 29/01/2019 10:21, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
How will that look like on Windows, will it use IO Completion Ports? I
guess scalability becomes much more of an issue with typical thousands
of classic sockets.
What’s the expected performance of this? The blocking IO had a lot
less latency compare
-...@openjdk.java.net; OpenJDK Network Dev list
Betreff: Re: NIO based SocketImpl to replace legacy PlainSocketImpl
Nice to see this, hope it works out.
Ismael
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019, 6:11 AM Alan Bateman
mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote:
I've created a branch in the sandbox, named "niosock
Nice to see this, hope it works out.
Ismael
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019, 6:11 AM Alan Bateman
> I've created a branch in the sandbox, named "niosocketimpl-branch", with
> a prototype SocketImpl implementation based on the infrastructure in
> sun.nio.ch package that supports the NIO channel implementati
