Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 02/25/11 05:22 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 02/25/11 02:39 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
Alan Bateman wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
Michael, Alan,
Some small cleanups to the use of scanf with specified string width.
The buffers should be sized large
Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 02/25/11 02:39 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
Alan Bateman wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
Michael, Alan,
Some small cleanups to the use of scanf with specified string width.
The buffers should be sized large enough to handle the specified
width and the null terminator.
http:
On 02/25/11 02:39 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
Alan Bateman wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
Michael, Alan,
Some small cleanups to the use of scanf with specified string width.
The buffers should be sized large enough to handle the specified
width and the null terminator.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/
Alan Bateman wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
Michael, Alan,
Some small cleanups to the use of scanf with specified string width.
The buffers should be sized large enough to handle the specified
width and the null terminator.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/7022269/webrev.00/webrev/
-Chris.
Chris Hegarty wrote:
Michael, Alan,
Some small cleanups to the use of scanf with specified string width.
The buffers should be sized large enough to handle the specified width
and the null terminator.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/7022269/webrev.00/webrev/
-Chris.
Looks okay although s
