Chris Hegarty wrote:
:
Yes, I should know better ( after trying to debug many of these
spurious failures ).
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/6964547/webrev.02/webrev/test/java/net/Socks/SocksProxyVersion.java.html
This looks fine to me.
-Alan
On 01/13/11 09:29 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
:
Ah yes, I just moved the socket close to after the version check. The
client will be blocked (in the socks protocol handhake) until the
socket on the server side is closed.
Updated test:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/6964547
Chris Hegarty wrote:
:
Ah yes, I just moved the socket close to after the version check. The
client will be blocked (in the socks protocol handhake) until the
socket on the server side is closed.
Updated test:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/6964547/webrev.02/webrev/test/java/net/Socks/So
On 01/12/11 06:25 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
:
Updated Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/6964547/webrev.02/webrev/
Looks fine except that that main thread needs to wait for the "socks
server" thread to terminate as otherwise the test might pass before the
thread sets
Chris Hegarty wrote:
:
Updated Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/6964547/webrev.02/webrev/
Looks fine except that that main thread needs to wait for the "socks
server" thread to terminate as otherwise the test might pass before the
thread sets failed to true.
-Alan
On 01/12/11 03:24 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
I received some offline comments on this.
1) SocksProxyVersionFour -> SocksProxy
2) SocksProxy now contains the protocol version
Updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/6964547/webrev.01/webrev/
-Chris.
This looks muc
On 01/12/11 03:36 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Can I also suggest that Proxy.Type.SOCKS gets deprecated and
Proxy.Type.SOCKS4 and Proxy.Type.SOCKS5 get introduced instead?
Just about every application treats SOCKS 4 and 5 as different proxy
types, only Java tries to lump th
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Can I also suggest that Proxy.Type.SOCKS gets deprecated and
Proxy.Type.SOCKS4 and Proxy.Type.SOCKS5 get introduced instead?
Just about every application treats SOCKS 4 and 5 as different proxy
types, only Java tries to lump them together.
I wonder if SOCKS4 is still
Can I also suggest that Proxy.Type.SOCKS gets deprecated and
Proxy.Type.SOCKS4 and Proxy.Type.SOCKS5 get introduced instead?
Just about every application treats SOCKS 4 and 5 as different proxy
types, only Java tries to lump them together.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
Chris Hegarty wrote:
I received some offline comments on this.
1) SocksProxyVersionFour -> SocksProxy
2) SocksProxy now contains the protocol version
Updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/6964547/webrev.01/webrev/
-Chris.
This looks much cleaner. A few minor comments on the chan
I received some offline comments on this.
1) SocksProxyVersionFour -> SocksProxy
2) SocksProxy now contains the protocol version
Updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/6964547/webrev.01/webrev/
-Chris.
On 01/11/11 03:00 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Michael, Alan,
Provide a property
11 matches
Mail list logo
