Re: AF_INET6 support

2016-10-18 Thread Chris Hegarty
On 13 Oct 2016, at 09:46, Langer, Christoph wrote: > > Hi Chris, > >>> I’ve got a question regarding AF_INET6. >>> >>> In jdk native code you’ll still find lots of code guarded by “#ifdef >>> AF_INET6”. >> I’m wondering if there are still supported build environments where AF_INET6 >> is not

RE: AF_INET6 support

2016-10-13 Thread Langer, Christoph
Hi Chris, > > I’ve got a question regarding AF_INET6. > > > > In jdk native code you’ll still find lots of code guarded by “#ifdef > > AF_INET6”. > I’m wondering if there are still supported build environments where AF_INET6 > is not defined. Or is it time now to assume AF_INET6 and remove this

Re: AF_INET6 support

2016-10-13 Thread Alan Bateman
On 13/10/2016 07:19, Langer, Christoph wrote: Hi networking experts, I’ve got a question regarding AF_INET6. In jdk native code you’ll still find lots of code guarded by “#ifdef AF_INET6”. I’m wondering if there are still supported build environments where AF_INET6 is not defined. Or is i

Re: AF_INET6 support

2016-10-13 Thread Chris Hegarty
Christoph, > On 13 Oct 2016, at 07:19, Langer, Christoph wrote: > > Hi networking experts, > > I’ve got a question regarding AF_INET6. > > In jdk native code you’ll still find lots of code guarded by “#ifdef > AF_INET6”. I’m wondering if there are still supported build environments > wher