Petteri Räty wrote:
Edward Wang kirjoitti:
The other is that I encourage you to sign SCA. Then I can incorporate
your code into OpenJDK code base. Here is how to do it:
http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
It should be simple enough.
I can look into if it's really want it but afaick it's t
Edward Wang kirjoitti:
> The other is that I encourage you to sign SCA. Then I can incorporate
> your code into OpenJDK code base. Here is how to do it:
> http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
> It should be simple enough.
>
I can look into if it's really want it but afaick it's the FSF policy
Hi Petteri,
Two things. One is that seems 6562614 still doesn't show up in
bugs.sun.com. I guess it's still on its way from our internal bug
database to public one. You could check it later on.
The other is that I encourage you to sign SCA. Then I can incorporate
your code into OpenJDK code
Hi Petteri,
Yes, we'd better to fix this. It is a straightforward one. A new CR,
6562614, has been filed against this. You could check it in bugs.sun.com.
And now I need to figure out how to go through internal process before I
could finally put back the code on your behave. Will keep you pos
