On 09/11/18 14:33, Pavel Rappo wrote:
Alan, Chris,
Thanks for reviewing this change. However, before the push I tested it again and
found out that there is a small number of Linux machines on which both tests
fail. The only thing I found to be in common between these machines was the
version of
Alan, Chris,
Thanks for reviewing this change. However, before the push I tested it again and
found out that there is a small number of Linux machines on which both tests
fail. The only thing I found to be in common between these machines was the
version of the Linux kernel. Machines with the 3.10
On 07/11/2018 16:23, Pavel Rappo wrote:
On 7 Nov 2018, at 15:22, Alan Bateman wrote:
Does the comment at L806 need to be updated? Also the change makes me wondering
about the 2.4 kernel support, maybe it is time to think about dropping some of
the older code path.
Alan,
Is that better?
> On 7 Nov 2018, at 15:22, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> Does the comment at L806 need to be updated? Also the change makes me
> wondering about the 2.4 kernel support, maybe it is time to think about
> dropping some of the older code path.
Alan,
Is that better?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prap
On 07/11/18 14:12, Pavel Rappo wrote:
Hello,
Please review the following change:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8210493/webrev.00
Thanks for doing this Pavel. The changes in the webrev
look good to me.
-Chris.
On 07/11/2018 14:12, Pavel Rappo wrote:
Hello,
Please review the following change:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8210493/webrev.00
This change fixes binding to interface-local and link-local IPv6 multicast
addresses on Linux.
Does the comment at L806 need to be updated? Also the change
Hello,
Please review the following change:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8210493/webrev.00
This change fixes binding to interface-local and link-local IPv6 multicast
addresses on Linux.
Thanks,
-Pavel
