On 10/11/2016 20:26, Chris Hegarty wrote:
:
It has, but, for me at least, since the changes for 7120665 [1] require a
conformant implementation to support at least one network interface, it
seems more like an error if we encounter this situation.
Ugh, I'd forgotten that needs to be supported t
Hi,
> On 10 Nov 2016, at 16:48, Alan Bateman wrote:
> > On 10/11/2016 16:39, Mark Sheppard wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> please oblige and review the change
> >>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~msheppar/8164815/webrev/src/java.base/share/cl
> asses/java/net/NetworkInterface.java.sdiff.html
> >>
> >> to ad
On 10 Nov 2016, at 16:48, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 10/11/2016 16:39, Mark Sheppard wrote:
>> Hi,
>> please oblige and review the change
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~msheppar/8164815/webrev/src/java.base/share/classes/java/net/NetworkInterface.java.sdiff.html
>>
>>
>> to address the issue ra
On 10/11/2016 16:39, Mark Sheppard wrote:
Hi,
please oblige and review the change
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~msheppar/8164815/webrev/src/java.base/share/classes/java/net/NetworkInterface.java.sdiff.html
to address the issue raised in
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8164815
It w
Hi,
please oblige and review the change
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~msheppar/8164815/webrev/src/java.base/share/classes/java/net/NetworkInterface.java.sdiff.html
to address the issue raised in
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8164815
It was found during testing that, when a system doe
