Re: RFR: JDK-4906983

2015-09-10 Thread Chris Hegarty
Another minor comment... While what you have suggested is not incorrect, I’m afraid it is giving the wrong impression about the typical acceptable port ranges. A port of Integer.MAX_VALUE is not all that useful, since it typically maps to a TCP port number ( but not always ). Maybe just remove

Re: RFR: JDK-4906983

2015-09-10 Thread Chris Hegarty
On 8 Sep 2015, at 21:01, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote: > Hi, > > Please find my small patch[1] to javadoc in java.net.URL that adresses > JDK-4906983(javadoc-fix)[2]. > > I signed the SCA/OCA some time ago. Feel free to check at the OCA > Signatures-List[3] > > thanks to david buck for hosting

RFR: JDK-4906983

2015-09-08 Thread Sebastian Sickelmann
Hi, Please find my small patch[1] to javadoc in java.net.URL that adresses JDK-4906983(javadoc-fix)[2]. I signed the SCA/OCA some time ago. Feel free to check at the OCA Signatures-List[3] thanks to david buck for hosting this patch on cr.openjdk.java.net. -- Sebastian Sickelmann [1] http://cr