On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 15:27:36 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could I get the following trivial doc changes reviewed please, caused by:
>>
>> - broken tags in MethodHandles referring to package.html instead of
>> package-summary.html
>>
>> - references to a package level #unixdomain anc
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:03:01 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could I get the following trivial doc changes reviewed please, caused by:
>
> - broken tags in MethodHandles referring to package.html instead of
> package-summary.html
>
> - references to a package level #unixdomain anchor t
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:03:01 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could I get the following trivial doc changes reviewed please, caused by:
>
> - broken tags in MethodHandles referring to package.html instead of
> package-summary.html
>
> - references to a package level #unixdomain anchor t
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:03:01 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could I get the following trivial doc changes reviewed please, caused by:
>
> - broken tags in MethodHandles referring to package.html instead of
> package-summary.html
>
> - references to a package level #unixdomain anchor t
Hi,
Could I get the following trivial doc changes reviewed please, caused by:
- broken tags in MethodHandles referring to package.html instead of
package-summary.html
- references to a package level #unixdomain anchor that no longer exists.
- a tag missing a "../" in SocketChannel
Thanks,
