On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:29:00 GMT, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/net/ftp/impl/FtpClient.java line 1777:
>>
>>> 1775: }
>>> 1776:
>>> 1777: private static Date parseRfc3659TimeValue(String s) {
>>
>> Shouldn't this method be synchronized because `SimpleDateForma
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 00:35:20 GMT, Marcono1234
wrote:
>> Igor Ignatyev has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> use only filename in assert message
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/net/ftp/impl/FtpClient.java line 1777:
>
>> 1
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 17:50:51 GMT, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> could you please review this small patch?
>>
>> according to [RFC3659](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3659), time values in
>> MLSx response have the following format:
>>>time-val = 14DIGIT [ "." 1*DIGIT ]
>>>
>>>
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:05:07 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Igor Ignatyev has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> use only filename in assert message
>
> Thanks for adding a test Igor!
> If that passes on all platform then this look
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 17:50:51 GMT, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> could you please review this small patch?
>>
>> according to [RFC3659](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3659), time values in
>> MLSx response have the following format:
>>>time-val = 14DIGIT [ "." 1*DIGIT ]
>>>
>>>
> Hi all,
>
> could you please review this small patch?
>
> according to [RFC3659](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3659), time values in
> MLSx response have the following format:
>>time-val = 14DIGIT [ "." 1*DIGIT ]
>>
>>The leading, mandatory, fourteen digits are to be interpreted as
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:04:56 GMT, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>> Hi Igor, is this testable - and if so shouldn't there be a test?
>> best regards,
>> -- daniel
>
>> Hi Igor, is this testable - and if so shouldn't there be a test?
>> best regards,
>> -- daniel
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> it's testable and origi
> Hi all,
>
> could you please review this small patch?
>
> according to [RFC3659](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3659), time values in
> MLSx response have the following format:
>>time-val = 14DIGIT [ "." 1*DIGIT ]
>>
>>The leading, mandatory, fourteen digits are to be interpreted as
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:33:06 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Hi Igor, is this testable - and if so shouldn't there be a test?
> best regards,
> -- daniel
Hi Daniel,
it's testable and originally I planned to add a new test, however upon checking
the existing mock ftp-servers, I realized that none of
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 23:14:40 GMT, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> could you please review this small patch?
>
> according to [RFC3659](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3659), time values in
> MLSx response have the following format:
>>time-val = 14DIGIT [ "." 1*DIGIT ]
>>
>>The lea
Hi all,
could you please review this small patch?
according to [RFC3659](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3659), time values in
MLSx response have the following format:
>time-val = 14DIGIT [ "." 1*DIGIT ]
>
>The leading, mandatory, fourteen digits are to be interpreted as, in
>order f
11 matches
Mail list logo
