Thanks.
On 07/05/2019, 14:55, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Looks good to me Michael!
best regards,
-- daniel
On 07/05/2019 14:50, Michael McMahon wrote:
Could I get the following small change reviewed please?
The recent change in the SocketImpl code unmasked the fact that
the protected constructor of
Looks good to me Michael!
best regards,
-- daniel
On 07/05/2019 14:50, Michael McMahon wrote:
Could I get the following small change reviewed please?
The recent change in the SocketImpl code unmasked the fact that
the protected constructor of ServerSocket was not checking for a null
impl param
Looks good to me.
Vyom
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 7:20 PM Michael McMahon
wrote:
> Could I get the following small change reviewed please?
> The recent change in the SocketImpl code unmasked the fact that
> the protected constructor of ServerSocket was not checking for a null
> impl parameter as req
Could I get the following small change reviewed please?
The recent change in the SocketImpl code unmasked the fact that
the protected constructor of ServerSocket was not checking for a null
impl parameter as required.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8223457/webrev.1/
Thanks
Michael
