On 18/04/16 11:09, Claes Redestad wrote:
On 04/18/2016 12:06 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 18/04/16 11:01, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 18/04/2016 10:45, Chris Hegarty wrote:
The changes look fine.
Maybe the bug description should be updated a before pushing,
it looks like it affects only legacy net
On 04/18/2016 12:06 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 18/04/16 11:01, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 18/04/2016 10:45, Chris Hegarty wrote:
The changes look fine.
Maybe the bug description should be updated a before pushing,
it looks like it affects only legacy networking code and not
NIO. Maybe "... and a
On 18/04/16 11:01, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 18/04/2016 10:45, Chris Hegarty wrote:
The changes look fine.
Maybe the bug description should be updated a before pushing,
it looks like it affects only legacy networking code and not
NIO. Maybe "... and async channels" ?
The changes to the NIO code
On 04/18/2016 12:01 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 18/04/2016 10:45, Chris Hegarty wrote:
The changes look fine.
Maybe the bug description should be updated a before pushing,
it looks like it affects only legacy networking code and not
NIO. Maybe "... and async channels" ?
The changes to the NIO c
On 04/18/2016 11:45 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 14/04/16 13:49, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
more code in the Windows socket implementation that can be dropped
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154238
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8154238/webrev.01/
The changes look
On 18/04/2016 10:45, Chris Hegarty wrote:
The changes look fine.
Maybe the bug description should be updated a before pushing,
it looks like it affects only legacy networking code and not
NIO. Maybe "... and async channels" ?
The changes to the NIO code look okay but probably should be split in
On 14/04/16 13:49, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
more code in the Windows socket implementation that can be dropped
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154238
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8154238/webrev.01/
The changes look fine.
Maybe the bug description should be upd
Hi,
more code in the Windows socket implementation that can be dropped
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154238
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8154238/webrev.01/
Thanks!
/Claes