As a point of process, and since the copyright year range update is not
strictly required, I typically leave it out of individual "bug" fixes. I
have seen too many times where it has caused unnecessary conflicts when
sync'ing or backporting.
-Chris.
On 09/10/2013 10:44 AM, Andreas Rieber wrot
On 10.09.2013 11:36, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 10/09/2013 10:27, Andreas Rieber wrote:
Minor hint, the copyright header year update is missing.
Andreas
We're not strictly required to do that each time, it's a confusing
point that comes up regularly (with the result that we are
inconsistent). The
On 10/09/2013 10:27, Andreas Rieber wrote:
Minor hint, the copyright header year update is missing.
Andreas
We're not strictly required to do that each time, it's a confusing point
that comes up regularly (with the result that we are inconsistent).
There's a script checked into the top-level r
Minor hint, the copyright header year update is missing.
Andreas
On 10.09.2013 11:09, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Trivial doclint issues in the com.sun.nio.sctp public package.
diff -r 4fd7abaf0a5f src/share/classes/com/sun/nio/sctp/Association.java
--- a/src/share/classes/com/sun/nio/sctp/Associatio
On 10/09/2013 10:09, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Trivial doclint issues in the com.sun.nio.sctp public package.
Looks okay to me.
I'd suggest checking the bug database as there are existing bugs for
this same issue.
-Alan
Trivial doclint issues in the com.sun.nio.sctp public package.
diff -r 4fd7abaf0a5f src/share/classes/com/sun/nio/sctp/Association.java
--- a/src/share/classes/com/sun/nio/sctp/Association.java Mon Sep
09 13:44:30 2013 +0100
+++ b/src/share/classes/com/sun/nio/sctp/Association.java T
