Am 18.06.19 um 15:20 schrieb Alan Bateman:
> On 18/06/2019 13:53, Andre Naujoks wrote:
>> :
>> We tried the old test-code with the Java Version from Debian
>> experimental and it does indeed work now on linux.
> Thanks for confirming.
>
>>
>> Java on Windows still throws an Exception when trying t
On 18/06/2019 13:53, Andre Naujoks wrote:
:
We tried the old test-code with the Java Version from Debian
experimental and it does indeed work now on linux.
Thanks for confirming.
Java on Windows still throws an Exception when trying to bind like this.
This shouldn't be a big surprise. It's ve
Am 18.06.19 um 08:07 schrieb Alan Bateman:
> On 02/05/2019 09:25, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 02/05/2019 08:44, Andre Naujoks wrote:
>>> Hello all.
>>>
>>> I just noticed, that the fix from Bug JDK-8210493 was reverted for Java
>>> 12. With a new bug JDK-8215294 taking over the issue.
>> Yes, it caus
On 02/05/2019 09:25, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 02/05/2019 08:44, Andre Naujoks wrote:
Hello all.
I just noticed, that the fix from Bug JDK-8210493 was reverted for Java
12. With a new bug JDK-8215294 taking over the issue.
Yes, it caused problems so had to be reverted. In addition to
JDK-8215294
We are currently investigating a more constrained fix for 8210493. I'll get back
to this list once it becomes clear(er) how to proceed.
> On 2 May 2019, at 08:44, Andre Naujoks wrote:
>
> Hello all.
>
> I just noticed, that the fix from Bug JDK-8210493 was reverted for Java
> 12. With a new bug
Am 02.05.19 um 19:57 schrieb Alan Bateman:
> On 02/05/2019 10:33, Andre Naujoks wrote:
>> :
>> I just wanted to notify you, that the whole issue with binding to a
>> multicast address is not Linux specific.
> Understood as it's always been platform specific as to whether you could
> bind to a multi
On 02/05/2019 10:33, Andre Naujoks wrote:
:
I just wanted to notify you, that the whole issue with binding to a
multicast address is not Linux specific.
Understood as it's always been platform specific as to whether you could
bind to a multicast address. This is one of the reason why we've had a
Am 02.05.19 um 10:25 schrieb Alan Bateman:
> On 02/05/2019 08:44, Andre Naujoks wrote:
>> Hello all.
>>
>> I just noticed, that the fix from Bug JDK-8210493 was reverted for Java
>> 12. With a new bug JDK-8215294 taking over the issue.
> Yes, it caused problems so had to be reverted. In addition to
On 02/05/2019 08:44, Andre Naujoks wrote:
Hello all.
I just noticed, that the fix from Bug JDK-8210493 was reverted for Java
12. With a new bug JDK-8215294 taking over the issue.
Yes, it caused problems so had to be reverted. In addition to
JDK-8215294 there is also JDK-8216417 which we expect
Hello all.
I just noticed, that the fix from Bug JDK-8210493 was reverted for Java
12. With a new bug JDK-8215294 taking over the issue.
Just to let you know, the issue is not linux specific (as the new bug
states). A test on a windows machine resulted in the same behavior.
Andre
### win10, o
10 matches
Mail list logo