Re: 8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

Hi Martin, On 2/22/2013 1:40 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote: Hi Joe, On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Joe Darcy > wrote: Should third-party vendor extensions that are "supported" for public use by the third-party use jdk.Supported? No; as I envision it

Re: 8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

Hi Joe, On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Joe Darcy wrote: > > Should third-party vendor extensions that are "supported" for public use > by the third-party use jdk.Supported? > > > No; as I envision it, the jdk.Supported annotation is only meant to convey > supported-ness in the JDK of parts o

Re: 8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

Hi Martin, On 2/22/2013 6:06 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Joe Darcy > wrote: However, the com.sun.* subpackages are a mix of APIs that are supported as described above as well as APIs that are not supported. I was under t

Re: 8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

On 22/02/2013 14:06, Martin Buchholz wrote: I was under the impression that the general rule was that all of com.sun.* fell under the "jdk supported" umbrella, and the level of support was the distinction between sun.com.* and sun.* . com.sun is a mixed bag. There are lots of com.sun.*.inter

Re: 8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

The security related ones look ok to me. --Sean On 02/21/2013 01:46 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: Joe Darcy recently added @jdk.Supported [1] to make it possible to identify JDK-specific APIs. I'd like to add this to a number of APIs in the com.sun namespace to make it obvious these are "supported"

Re: 8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Joe Darcy wrote: > > However, the com.sun.* subpackages are a mix of APIs that are supported as > described above as well as APIs that are not supported. I was under the impression that the general rule was that all of com.sun.* fell under the "jdk supported" um

Re: 8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

Thank you Alan, this will clear up a lot of issues surrounding these API's. I skimmed over the changes, paying particular attention to the httpserver and sctp packages. -Chris. On 02/21/2013 06:46 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: Joe Darcy recently added @jdk.Supported [1] to make it possible to ide

Re: 8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

On 02/21/2013 10:46 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: Joe Darcy recently added @jdk.Supported [1] to make it possible to identify JDK-specific APIs. I'd like to add this to a number of APIs in the com.sun namespace to make it obvious these are "supported". Specifically I'm proposing to add it to:

Re: 8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

On 2/21/2013 10:46 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: Joe Darcy recently added @jdk.Supported [1] to make it possible to identify JDK-specific APIs. I'd like to add this to a number of APIs in the com.sun namespace to make it obvious these are "supported". It's nice to be able to mark what is suppor

Re: 8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

Well, that was quite a few files to have to go through :-) Looks fine On Feb 21, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: > > Joe Darcy recently added @jdk.Supported [1] to make it possible to identify > JDK-specific APIs. > > I'd like to add this to a number of APIs in the com.sun namespace to

8008662: Add @jdk.Supported to JDK-specific/supported API

Joe Darcy recently added @jdk.Supported [1] to make it possible to identify JDK-specific APIs. I'd like to add this to a number of APIs in the com.sun namespace to make it obvious these are "supported". Specifically I'm proposing to add it to: - Java Debug Interface (com.sun.jdi) - Attach