On Monday 04 May 2015 22:26:26 Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> not sure how I feel about the res_init(). Depending on the backends
> used this might be expensive. Especially since it wont be rate
> limited. The negative-ttl of 10s is for single records I thing. So at a
> minimum you should rate-limit res_
Hi Christos,
On Monday 04 May 2015 21:16:40 Christos Zoulas wrote:
> I don't think it is the job of the JDK to handle this. For example
> many systems (like NetBSD for example) work just fine without
> needing this, because their libc keeps track of resolv.conf changes.
Normally I would agree wit
Hi All,
We are facing an issue with DNS server caching on RHEL-based distros: after
the update of resolv.conf java application cannot resolve the hosts any more.
Reproducer is very simple:
1. Clean /etc/resolv.conf or connect to vpn and use vpn-only nameserver.
2. Launch the minimal java app [1]
