On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 21:09:03 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Use presumed syntax that will be introduced by JDK-8280488.
Marked as reviewed by serb (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7189
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 20:46:36 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> `Properties.load` uses `java.util.Properties.LineReader`. LineReader already
> buffers input stream. Hence wrapping InputStream in BufferedInputStream is
> redundant.
Marked as reviewed by serb (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://g
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 20:46:36 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> `Properties.load` uses `java.util.Properties.LineReader`. LineReader already
> buffers input stream. Hence wrapping InputStream in BufferedInputStream is
> redundant.
The code change looks fine, but can you please check the actual perf
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 21:51:30 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
> Here are the code changes for the "Deprecate finalizers in the standard Java
> API" portion of JEP 421 ("Deprecate Finalization for Removal") for code
> review.
>
> This change makes the indicated deprecations, and updates the API spec
On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 02:53:44 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> This is the continuation of JDK-8233884, JDK-8271456, and JDK-8272120.
>
> In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
> absolutePath.getBytes("UTF-8");
>
> This could be don
n this fix: the Xerces library(should be fixed upstream),
> J2DBench(should be compatible to 1.4), some code in the network(the change
> there are not straightforward, will do it later).
>
> Tested by the tier1/tier2/tier3 tests on Linux/Windows/macOS.
Sergey Bylokhov has updated the
n this fix: the Xerces library(should be fixed upstream),
> J2DBench(should be compatible to 1.4), some code in the network(the change
> there are not straightforward, will do it later).
>
> Tested by the tier1/tier2/tier3 tests on Linux/Windows/macOS.
Sergey Bylokhov has updated the
On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:39:36 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> Sergey Bylokhov has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request cont
On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 23:02:06 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> This is the continuation of JDK-8233884, JDK-8271456, and JDK-8272120.
>>
>> In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
>> absolutePath.getBytes("UTF-8");
>>
&
On Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:01:48 GMT, Andrey Turbanov
wrote:
> Collections.sort is just a wrapper, so it is better to use an instance method
> directly.
The changes in the src/java.desktop/ looks fine.
Filed: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8272863
-
Marked as reviewed by s
On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 18:31:02 GMT, Andrey Turbanov
wrote:
> I think it's worth to update _static_ initializer in
> `sun.datatransfer.DataFlavorUtil.CharsetComparator` too.
Updated as suggested.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5210
On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 15:09:26 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Sergey Bylokhov has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request cont
n this fix: the Xerces library(should be fixed upstream),
> J2DBench(should be compatible to 1.4), some code in the network(the change
> there are not straightforward, will do it later).
>
> Tested by the tier1/tier2/tier3 tests on Linux/Windows/macOS.
Sergey Bylokhov has updated the
This is the continuation of JDK-8233884, JDK-8271456, and JDK-8272120.
See https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/5063 and
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/4951
In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
absolutePath.getBytes("UTF-8");
This could be done more ef
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 05:08:54 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> This is the continuation of JDK-8233884 and JDK-8271456. This change affects
> fewer cases so I fix all "java." modules at once.
>
> In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
&
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:18:39 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> It would be useful to get up to date performance data on using Charset vs.
> charset name. At least historically, the charset name versions were faster
> (see [JDK-6764325](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6764325)).
The code in q
This is the continuation of JDK-8233884 and JDK-8271456. This change affects
fewer cases so I fix all "java." modules at once.
In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
absolutePath.getBytes("UTF-8");
This could be done more efficiently(up to x20 time faster) w
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:04:26 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов
wrote:
>> In some cases wrapping of `InputStream` with `BufferedInputStream` is
>> redundant, e.g. in case the wrapped one is `ByteArrayOutputStream` which
>> does not require any buffer having one within.
>>
>> Other cases are related to readi
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 19:35:25 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов
wrote:
>> In some cases wrapping of `InputStream` with `BufferedInputStream` is
>> redundant, e.g. in case the wrapped one is `ByteArrayOutputStream` which
>> does not require any buffer having one within.
>>
>> Other cases are related to readi
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 20:33:43 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>>> One or two of the sources changes should probably uses Files.copy, e.g.
>>> ZipPath, sjavac/CopyFile.java.
>>
>> Good idea! Replaced in few places. But not in ZipPath: it's actually
>> implementation of underlying call from Files.copy:
>>
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 20:11:24 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
> This PR proposes to remove
> 1. JavaDoc `@author` tags with unclear semantics: `@author
> unascribed|unattributed|unknown`
> 2. A couple of astray Form Feed (a.k.a. FF, `\f`, `0xC`, or `^L`) characters
Marked as reviewed by serb (Reviewer).
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:40:02 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов
wrote:
>> client changes are fine
>
> Rebased onto master to have the fix introduced in
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/778
FYI it is better to use merge, instead of rebase+force push. Rebase breaks
history and all existed code comments.
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:46:15 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов
wrote:
> As discussed in https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/510 there is never a
> reason to explicitly instantiate any instance of `Atomic*` class with its
> default value, i.e. `new AtomicInteger(0)` could be replaced with `new
> AtomicInteg
On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 13:57:19 GMT, Dmitriy Dumanskiy
wrote:
> **isEmpty** is faster + has less byte code + easier to read. Benchmarks could
> be found
>
> [here](https://medium.com/javarevisited/micro-optimizations-in-java-string-equals-22be19fd8416).
src/demo/share/java2d/J2DBench/src/j2dben
24 matches
Mail list logo
