Re: HTTP/2 Client WebSocket support

2016-08-18 Thread Rahman USTA
It is okay, I now clearly understand this usage. Thank you for helping me to understand the WebSocket Client API clearly. Best regards. 2016-08-18 16:16 GMT+03:00 Pavel Rappo : > > > On 18 Aug 2016, at 13:54, Rahman USTA wrote: > > > > A WebSocket server can send any m

Re: HTTP/2 Client WebSocket support

2016-08-18 Thread Rahman USTA
will be able to get any message at any time with this API ? For example, if our server pushes new stock exchange data to our client, how can I get this multiple data from server when they come ? Thanks 2016-08-18 14:23 GMT+03:00 Pavel Rappo : > > > On 18 Aug 2016, at 11:44, Rahman US

Re: HTTP/2 Client WebSocket support

2016-08-18 Thread Rahman USTA
Hmm, how should I refactor it on my code to make it clear? Best regards. 2016-08-18 13:41 GMT+03:00 Pavel Rappo : > > > On 18 Aug 2016, at 11:38, Rahman USTA wrote: > > > > It requests when connection is open, isn't it a right place to start > WebSocket convers

Re: HTTP/2 Client WebSocket support

2016-08-18 Thread Rahman USTA
worry > about that ever again. > > Thanks. > > > > [1] http://www.reactive-streams.org > > > On 18 Aug 2016, at 11:17, Rahman USTA wrote: > > > > Hi Pavel; > > > > My WebSocket client is; > > > > URI uri =

Re: HTTP/2 Client WebSocket support

2016-08-18 Thread Rahman USTA
-- > [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8161333?jql=labels% > 20%3D%20websocket%20and%20labels%20%3D%20jep-110% > 20and%20status%20not%20in%20(resolved%2C%20closed) > > > On 18 Aug 2016, at 10:38, Rahman USTA wrote: > > > > Hello; > >

HTTP/2 Client WebSocket support

2016-08-18 Thread Rahman USTA
have this code, it connects to WebSocket server, but after connection it doesn't get messages sent from server. Is this feature ready to test? Thanks. -- Rahman USTA Istanbul JUG https://github.com/rahmanusta <http://www.kodcu.com/>

Re: JEP 110 - Violating Naming Convention ?

2016-08-17 Thread Rahman USTA
uld look even strange. With all uppercase > it is rather clear its an HTTP/2 method keyword. > > Gruss > Bernd > > Am Wed, 17 Aug 2016 > 16:51:18 +0300 schrieb Rahman USTA : > > > Thank you Pavel, this uncommon usage looks to me very weird. > > > > I hop

Re: JEP 110 - Violating Naming Convention ?

2016-08-17 Thread Rahman USTA
nes. One can override them in some > circumstances where it makes a lot of sense. Yes, the barrier for > violations > should be high. I believe this is one of the cases. > > > On 17 Aug 2016, at 14:12, Rahman USTA wrote: > > > > Hello; > > > > I'm tr