Hi Andrew,
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 20:35 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/8/21 Mark Wielaard :
> > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:40 -0700, Mark Reinhold wrote:
> >> This change was integrated prematurely. I've rolled it back in the
> >> jdk7/tl/jdk repository.
&g
Hi Mark,
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:40 -0700, Mark Reinhold wrote:
> This change was integrated prematurely. I've rolled it back in the
> jdk7/tl/jdk repository.
If at all possible, please don't do this. It plays havoc with already
checked out repos and/or automatic clones/backups. You force peopl
Hi Alan,
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 17:58 +0100, Alan Bateman wrote:
> It's been on my list to forward-port the TestEnv and test updates to
> jdk7 (just haven't got to it yet).
Thanks.
> The idea with that was that jtreg
> would be run with a properties file that listed the hosts that the tests
>
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 00:05 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> I made sure all needed services are enabled on
> icedtea.classpath.org/developer.classpath.org and set those as defaults
> in TestEnv for the net/nio tests that need to contact hosts. Using
> icedtea for remote_host and d
Hi Sherman,
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 08:42 -0800, Xueming Shen wrote:
> No, you did not miss anything. The "original patch proposal " had not
> been sent to
> any of the community mailing lists, the "reviewed-by" is for the final
> code review,
> which was not sent to the mailing list as well, I
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 06:57 +, xueming.s...@sun.com wrote:
> Changeset: 57dc40ece164
> Author:sherman
> Date: 2008-12-17 22:50 -0800
> URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/57dc40ece164
>
> 6496274: jar seems to use more CPU than it should
> Summary: boost jar cre
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 15:03 +0100, Christopher Hegarty - Sun
Microsystems Ireland wrote:
> Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
> > Yes, I've already asked Chris to fix this in OpenJDK 6 too.
>
> I pushed these changes into the OpenJDK 6 workspace, so it will be in
> the next build/push.
Thanks a lot!
F
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 09:46 -0700, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> Probably true that the test can be re-written, and you are right, a 500K
> binary file is not something I want in the repository either.
> Unfortunately, some engineers have the historical and bad habit of just
> adding in files to workspaces
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 20:23 +0800, Max (Weijun) Wang wrote:
> The bug id should have been 6740833.
Aha! The 7 and 4 got swapped. Thanks. And the jcheck scripts would then
have prevented that bug to ever get fixed again. Although I guess you
could reuse the swapped bug number for that one then :)
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 14:16 -0700, Mark Reinhold wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:08:38 -0700
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Last night there was a changeset introduced to the JSN gate that
> > contained an incorrect changeset comment. Rather than pollute the
> > changeset history for
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 12:16 +0100, Alan Bateman wrote:
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > :
> > This seems to introduce a new public API in the java.net package.
> > I was wondering how that works for someone that wants to introduce
> > such things in openjdk.
> There is
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:43:59PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jsn/jdk/rev/f4289d75cd29
>
> 6717876: Make java.net.NetworkInterface.getIndex() public
> Summary: Make getIndex() and getByIndex() public. Required a name change in
> native code
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
