by the IETF.
That is a definite risk. Currently we are discussing more complex
notations for representing things like default values, prefixes,
suffixes etc. The simple {param_name} syntax is likely to survive
though so its possible we could implement that initially and add full
support in a subsequ
or the JSR311 class is at
https://jsr311.dev.java.net/nonav/javadoc/index.html
and Paul Sandoz's blog entry talking about it is at
http://blogs.sun.com/sandoz/entry/building_uris
The javadoc for the proposed UrlEncodedQueryString is attached
in a zip file
Thanks,
Michael.
--
Richa
