Integrated: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability

2022-05-13 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 11:22:48 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > I ran `codespell` on modules owned by the serviceability team > (`java.instrument java.management.rmi java.management jdk.attach > jdk.hotspot.agent jdk.internal.jvmstat jdk.jcmd jdk.jconsole jdk.jdi > jdk.jdwp.agen

Re: RFR: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability [v3]

2022-05-13 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
port for running `codespell`. > The trouble with automating this is of course all false positives. But before > even trying to solve that issue, all true positives must be fixed. Hence this > PR. Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit

Re: RFR: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability [v2]

2022-05-13 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
port for running `codespell`. > The trouble with automating this is of course all false positives. But before > even trying to solve that issue, all true positives must be fixed. Hence this > PR. Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit

Re: RFR: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability

2022-04-21 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:17:20 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote: >> I ran `codespell` on modules owned by the serviceability team >> (`java.instrument java.management.rmi java.management jdk.attach >> jdk.hotspot.agent jdk.internal.jvmstat jdk.jcmd jdk.jconsole jdk.jdi >> jdk.jdwp.agent jdk.jstatd jdk.man

Re: RFR: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability

2022-04-21 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 14:03:39 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote: >> I ran `codespell` on modules owned by the serviceability team >> (`java.instrument java.management.rmi java.management jdk.attach >> jdk.hotspot.agent jdk.internal.jvmstat jdk.jcmd jdk.jconsole jdk.jdi >> jdk.jdwp.agent jdk.jstatd jdk.ma

RFR: 8285366: Fix typos in serviceability

2022-04-21 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
I ran `codespell` on modules owned by the serviceability team (`java.instrument java.management.rmi java.management jdk.attach jdk.hotspot.agent jdk.internal.jvmstat jdk.jcmd jdk.jconsole jdk.jdi jdk.jdwp.agent jdk.jstatd jdk.management.agent jdk.management`), and accepted those changes where it

Integrated: 8284893: Fix typos in java.base

2022-04-19 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:07:09 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.base` directory, and accepted those > changes where it indeed discovered real typos. > > (Due to false positives this can unfortunately not be run automatically) > > The majori

Re: RFR: 8284893: Fix typos in java.base [v3]

2022-04-19 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 16:24:43 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: >> I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.base` directory, and accepted those >> changes where it indeed discovered real typos. >> >> (Due to false positives this can unfortunately not be run automatically) >

Re: RFR: 8284893: Fix typos in java.base [v4]

2022-04-19 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
> local variable name, and a couple in parameter declarations. > > Annoyingly, there are several instances of "childs" (instead of "children") > in the source code, but they were not local and I dared not change them. > Someone braver than me might take a stab

Re: RFR: 8284893: Fix typos in java.base [v3]

2022-04-19 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
> local variable name, and a couple in parameter declarations. > > Annoyingly, there are several instances of "childs" (instead of "children") > in the source code, but they were not local and I dared not change them. > Someone braver than me might take a stab

Re: RFR: 8284893: Fix typos in java.base [v2]

2022-04-19 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
> local variable name, and a couple in parameter declarations. > > Annoyingly, there are several instances of "childs" (instead of "children") > in the source code, but they were not local and I dared not change them. > Someone braver than me might take a stab

Re: RFR: 8284890: Support for Do not fragment IP socket options [v2]

2022-04-19 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 11:49:29 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Could I get the following PR review please? It adds a new JDK specific >> extended socket option >> called IP_DONTFRAGMENT, which disables IP packet fragmentation in both IPv4 >> and IPv6 >> UDP sockets (NIO DatagramChannels

RFR: 8284893: Fix typos in java.base

2022-04-14 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
I ran `codespell` on the `src/java.base` directory, and accepted those changes where it indeed discovered real typos. (Due to false positives this can unfortunately not be run automatically) The majority of fixes are in comments. A handful is in strings, one in a local variable name, and a cou

Re: RFR: 8282657: Code cleanup: removing double semicolons at the end of lines

2022-03-07 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 16:40:15 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote: >> Hi >> >> I have reviewed the code for removing double semicolons at the end of lines >> >> all the best >> matteo > > What problem are you having editing the PR header? You should be able to do > so as the author of the PR @LanceAnde

Re: RFR: 8282657: Code cleanup: removing double semicolons at the end of lines

2022-03-04 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 17:17:12 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: >> Hi >> >> I have reviewed the code for removing double semicolons at the end of lines >> >> all the best >> matteo > > We usually request that these be be broken up by area to attract the > appropriate reviewers and avoid eye-strain. The c

Re: RFR: 8277459: Add jwebserver tool [v6]

2021-11-30 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 17:00:24 GMT, Julia Boes wrote: >> This change introduces jwebserver, a dedicated JDK tool for the Simple Web >> Server. >> >> A description is provided in a follow-up comment. > > Julia Boes has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge > or a rebase.

Re: RFR: 8277459: Add jwebserver tool

2021-11-24 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 09:43:19 GMT, Julia Boes wrote: > This change introduces jwebserver, a dedicated JDK tool for the Simple Web > Server. > > A description is provided in a follow-up comment. Build changes look good. src/jdk.httpserver/share/classes/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/JWebServe

Integrated: 8277016: Use blessed modifier order in jdk.httpserver

2021-11-12 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 14:58:45 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > I ran bin/blessed-modifier-order.sh on source in jdk.httpserver. This scripts > verifies that modifiers are in the "blessed" order, and fixes it otherwise. I > have manually checked the changes made by the scrip

RFR: 8277016: Use blessed modifier order in httpserver

2021-11-11 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
I ran bin/blessed-modifier-order.sh on source in jdk.httpserver. This scripts verifies that modifiers are in the "blessed" order, and fixes it otherwise. I have manually checked the changes made by the script to make sure they are sound. - Commit messages: - 8277016: Use blessed m

Integrated: 8276655: Use blessed modifier order in SCTP

2021-11-04 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 17:09:16 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > I ran bin/blessed-modifier-order.sh on source owned by net libs. This scripts > verifies that modifiers are in the "blessed" order, and fixes it otherwise. I > have manually checked the changes made by the scrip

RFR: 8276655: Use blessed modifier order in SCTP

2021-11-04 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
I ran bin/blessed-modifier-order.sh on source owned by net libs. This scripts verifies that modifiers are in the "blessed" order, and fixes it otherwise. I have manually checked the changes made by the script to make sure they are sound. - Commit messages: - 8276655: Use blessed m

Re: RFR: JDK-8275518: accessibility issue in Inet6Address docs

2021-10-26 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:50:20 GMT, Ludvig Janiuk wrote: > Single-row table was being used as a hack here, a description list > seems more appropriate Looks good to me. - Marked as reviewed by ihse (Reviewer). PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6010

Re: RFR: 8245095: Implementation of JEP 408: Simple Web Server

2021-09-14 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:52:37 GMT, Julia Boes wrote: > This change implements a simple web server that can be run on the > command-line with `java -m jdk.httpserver`. > > This is facilitated by adding an entry point for the `jdk.httpserver` module, > an implementation class whose main method is

Re: RFR(S): 8252407: Build failure with gcc-8+ and asan

2020-09-30 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2020-09-29 13:17, Kim Barrett wrote: On Sep 29, 2020, at 6:51 AM, Kim Barrett wrote: On Sep 28, 2020, at 11:13 AM, Eric Liu wrote: Hi, Thanks for looking at this. For gcc-10, it's hard to make 'strncpy' all right with asan enabled (approaches we talked previous don't work). I'm tryi

Re: RFR(S): 8252407: Build failure with gcc-8+ and asan

2020-09-02 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2020-09-02 09:50, Kim Barrett wrote: On Sep 2, 2020, at 2:39 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2020-09-01 11:46, Kim Barrett wrote: I really hate -Wstringop-truncation. It's been a constant source of churn for us ever since it appeared. The changes being made to getIndex and get

Re: RFR(S): 8252407: Build failure with gcc-8+ and asan

2020-09-01 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2020-09-01 11:46, Kim Barrett wrote: On Sep 1, 2020, at 4:01 AM, Eric Liu wrote: Hi all, Please review this simple change to fix some compile warnings. The newer gcc (gcc-8 or higher) would warn for calls to bounded string manipulation functions such as 'strncpy' that may either truncate t

Re: RFR: 8244224: Implementation of JEP 381: Remove the Solaris and SPARC Ports - (core libraries)

2020-05-08 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2020-05-07 23:27, Mikael Vidstedt wrote: On May 7, 2020, at 7:52 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: Hi Mikael, I may have created solinux when the macosx port was merged and in an effort to reduce the CPP conditionals. solinux = solaris + linux ie. Vanilla unix code vs Darwin code IIRC has

Re: RFR [9] Warning notice for types in Incubator Modules

2017-01-26 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2017-01-25 13:51, Chris Hegarty wrote: On 24 Jan 2017, at 16:44, Erik Joelsson wrote: Hello, Build changes look good except for one thing. In Javadoc.gmk, the dependency on $(BUILD_TOOLS_JDK) needs to be set for $$($1_INDEX_FILE) (on line 317), where the actual recipes are created. Settin

Re: RFR: 7076487 (sctp) SCTP API classes does not exist in JDK for Mac

2013-10-10 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2013-10-10 12:10, Michael McMahon wrote: Can I get the following change for jdk 8 reviewed please? It's a simple build change to enable compilation of the dummy SCTP API layer on macosx, plus the dummy implementation used on windows. The existing jdk_sctp tests cover this. http://cr.openjdk