Integrated: JDK-8275518: accessibility issue in Inet6Address docs

2021-10-28 Thread Ludvig Janiuk
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:50:20 GMT, Ludvig Janiuk wrote: > Single-row table was being used for visual effect, but a description list > seems more appropriate. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: abe52aea Author:Ludvig Janiuk Committer: Jonathan Gibbons URL:

Re: RFR: JDK-8275518: accessibility issue in Inet6Address docs

2021-10-28 Thread Ludvig Janiuk
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:50:20 GMT, Ludvig Janiuk wrote: > Single-row table was being used for visual effect, but a description list > seems more appropriate. Done. I'm happy to drop them, I was just trying to keep the visuals as close to the original as possible. ![image](h

Re: RFR: JDK-8275518: accessibility issue in Inet6Address docs [v2]

2021-10-28 Thread Ludvig Janiuk
> Single-row table was being used for visual effect, but a description list > seems more appropriate. Ludvig Janiuk has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Removed html fluff - Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.ja

Re: RFR: JDK-8275518: accessibility issue in Inet6Address docs

2021-10-26 Thread Ludvig Janiuk
On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:44:38 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote: >> Single-row table was being used as a hack here, a description list >> seems more appropriate > > Would it be possible to build documentation for that page to see how it looks? @pavelrappo here's a screengrab from my local build. It doesn't

RFR: JDK-8275518: accessibility issue in Inet6Address docs

2021-10-25 Thread Ludvig Janiuk
Single-row table was being used as a hack here, a description list seems more appropriate - Commit messages: - Improve documentation accessibility Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6010/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=6010&range=00 Issue: