Re: RFR: 8283805: [REDO] JDK 19 L10n resource files update - msgdrop 10

2022-03-30 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:43:49 GMT, Alisen Chung wrote: > redo of 8280400 Since this is identical to the original fix, I would expect the same Tier2 test failure as reported in [JDK-8283804](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8283804). - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/p

Re: RFR: 8283806: [BACKOUT] JDK 19 L10n resource files update - msgdrop 10

2022-03-28 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 21:20:00 GMT, Alisen Chung wrote: > This reverts commit c0aecd15ae8d7abf37901f785fccaff2317c3b23. I confirm that this is an exact backout of [JDK-8280400](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280400). - Marked as reviewed by kcr (Author). PR: https://git.

Re: RFR: 8282657: Code cleanup: removing double semicolons at the end of lines

2022-03-07 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 17:12:25 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > TheShermanTanker is not the author of this PR, he's just assisting the author > by creating the JBS issue. Ah, that explains it then. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7268

Re: RFR: 8282657: Code cleanup: removing double semicolons at the end of lines

2022-03-07 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:39:31 GMT, Matteo Baccan wrote: > Hi > > I have reviewed the code for removing double semicolons at the end of lines > > all the best > matteo But as the JBS title and PR title now match, this is a moot point. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/726

Re: RFR: 8282657: Code cleanup: removing double semicolons at the end of lines

2022-03-07 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 16:40:15 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote: > What problem are you having editing the PR header? You should be able to do > so as the author of the PR Exactly. You should see an "Edit" button near the right edge of the PR title. See the attached image: ![PR-title](https://user-imag

Re: RFR: 8271396: Spelling errors

2021-07-28 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:08:01 GMT, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> I'm happy to sponsor this change, but could you please update the copyright >> year where necessary, e.g. in >> src/java.desktop/unix/classes/sun/awt/X11/XMSelection.java: >> `Copyright (c) 2003, 2018, Oracle...` -> `Copyright (c) 200

Re: RFR: 8266459: Implement JEP 411: Deprecate the Security Manager for Removal [v3]

2021-05-20 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 19 May 2021 13:47:53 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote: >> Please review this implementation of [JEP >> 411](https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/411). >> >> The code change is divided into 3 commits. Please review them one by one. >> >> 1. >> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/576161d15423f58281e38

Re: RFR: 8252999: Cleanup: replace .equals("") with .isEmpty() within all codebase

2020-09-10 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:21:28 GMT, David Holmes wrote: >> The code in java.base was updated to use String::isEmpty in JDK 12 >> (JDK-8215281). There was follow-up in JDK 13 to do >> the same in the java.desktop module (JDK-8223237). Changing the remaining >> usages make sense although I see that

Re: RFR: 8252999: replace all String.equals("") usages with String.isEmpty()

2020-09-10 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 07:57:48 GMT, Dmitriy Dumanskiy wrote: >> @doom369 jcheck requires an associated issue > > @mrserb hello. Thanks for the review. Any further actions required from me? Before this Enhancement can be formally reviewed, you will need a JBS bug ID. If you are already working wit