Hi Michael,
Any progress in the review of this CCC request?
Thanks a lot!
On 11/23/2012 11:50 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
Hi Deven
The CCC request is entered on the system but not reviewed yet.
I will get back to you next week after the US break.
- Michael.
On 23/11/12 08:10, Deven You wrote
Hi Michael,
Is there any progress for the CCC request? I hope we can get some update
from you.
Thanks a lot!
On 08/03/2012 03:29 PM, Deven You wrote:
Hi Michael,
Any suggestion or comments for this issue?
Thanks a lot!
On 08/01/2012 01:49 PM, Deven You wrote:
Hi Michael,
I have
Hi Michael,
Any suggestion or comments for this issue?
Thanks a lot!
On 08/01/2012 01:49 PM, Deven You wrote:
Hi Michael,
I have submitted a sun bug 7188315. I do not know about CCC request,
if needed, please conduct me to request it.
Thanks a lot!
On 07/31/2012 05:32 PM, Michael McMahon
Michael
On 31/07/12 08:14, Deven You wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for your review, I have updated the patch[1] according to your
comments.
[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~youdwei/ojdk-527/webrev.03/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eyoudwei/ojdk-527/webrev.02/>
Thanks a lot!
On 07/25/2012
/12 07:17, Deven You wrote:
Hi Alan and Michael,
I add a java doc[1] for the new networkaddress.cache.localhost.ttl
property. Please take a look when you have time.
The change looks fine to me. There is a typo in the apidoc in InetAddress.
"as as" should be "as an". Migh
a.net/~youdwei/ojdk-527/webrev.01/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eyoudwei/ojdk-527/webrev.01/>
Thanks a lot!
On 07/12/2012 02:59 PM, Deven You wrote:
Hi Alan and Michael,
Thanks very much for your kind suggestions.
I agree that local host shouldn't follow the default caching mechanism
e fallback properties so I have no
idea where I can do the same thing for networkaddress.cache.localhost.ttl.
Please take a look.
Thanks a lot!
On 07/11/2012 06:55 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
On 11/07/12 08:00, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 05/07/2012 07:10, Deven You wrote:
Hi All,
I no
Hi All,
There is anybody notice this issue.
Thanks a lot!
On 07/05/2012 02:10 PM, Deven You wrote:
Hi All,
I noticed that InetAddress.getLocalHost() uses cache to improve the
performance. However the default implementation is caching local host
within 5 seconds.
From the spec
Hi All,
I noticed that InetAddress.getLocalHost() uses cache to improve the
performance. However the default implementation is caching local host
within 5 seconds.
From the spec, networkaddress.cache.ttl should be used to control the
cache behaviour and I think it is a better solution.
For
: InetAddress.isReachable should support pinging 0.0.0.0
Reviewed-by: alanb, chegar
Please verify it and thank you all for reviewing it.
On 05/09/2012 11:36 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi Alan,
Since this patch is for Unix like platforms, I didn't test the test
case on Windows yet.
However when I t
Hi All,
When start a simple server, listening on a port like 8765, which just
accepts connections. We then register a non-blocking SocketChannel (the
client) with a selector with interest in OP_CONNECT, so that we can use
the selector to notify us when the channel is ready to finish connecting
I suddenly realized this topic should be in nio-dev mailing list. Please
ignore previous mail.
Thanks a lot!
On 05/09/2012 03:26 PM, Deven You wrote:
Hi All,
When start a simple server, listening on a port like 8765, which just
accepts connections. We then register a non-blocking
rther investigation to see why
these 2 addresses can not be reachable or we just think it is the proper
behavior because JDK's behavior is consistent with ping on Windows?
Thanks a lot!
On 05/07/2012 03:46 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 07/05/2012 03:29, Deven You wrote:
Hi Alan and Chris,
I have u
Hi Alan and Chris,
I have updated the webrev[1] according to your suggestions.
For the test case, I did two things:
1. add the @run main/othervm -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true PingThis
2. Only when !preferIPv4Stack and hasIPv6(), ::0 will be added into the
address list.
I think it's enough
Hi Alan,
I have updated the patch and test[1] for ::0. Please review it.
[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~littlee/OJDK-217/webrev.03/
Thanks a lot!
On 04/27/2012 04:41 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 27/04/2012 06:47, Deven You wrote:
Hi Alan,
Sorry for the test results of PingThis.java on ::0
Hi Alan,
Sorry for the test results of PingThis.java on ::0. I just missed to
test it with sudo privilege. Actually It also fails with sudo privilege.
I will look into the ipv6 branch to see why the ::0 also fails.
Thanks a lot!
On 04/27/2012 09:35 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi Alan,
I have
mentation for ::0.
[2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~littlee/OJDK-217/webrev.02/
Thanks a lot!
On 04/25/2012 05:15 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 25/04/2012 07:18, Deven You wrote:
Hi Michael,
I also add the bug number into the test case[1], please review it:
[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~youdwei
appear to support pinging 0.0.0.0. What is the official
position on 0.0.0.0 as a destination address?
- Michael.
On 23/04/12 06:57, Deven You wrote:
On 04/09/2012 03:57 PM, Deven You wrote:
Hi net-devs,
There is a test case [1] can reproduce this problem. Please use root
privilege to run this
. What is the official
position on 0.0.0.0 as a destination address?
- Michael.
On 23/04/12 06:57, Deven You wrote:
On 04/09/2012 03:57 PM, Deven You wrote:
Hi net-devs,
There is a test case [1] can reproduce this problem. Please use root
privilege to run this test case(create raw socket need
On 04/09/2012 03:57 PM, Deven You wrote:
Hi net-devs,
There is a test case [1] can reproduce this problem. Please use root
privilege to run this test case(create raw socket need root privilege).
Test results:
sudo ~/jdks/oracle/jdk1.7.0_03/bin/java Javanet
The target ip is 0.0.0.0
the
Hi net-devs,
There is a test case [1] can reproduce this problem. Please use root
privilege to run this test case(create raw socket need root privilege).
Test results:
sudo ~/jdks/oracle/jdk1.7.0_03/bin/java Javanet
The target ip is 0.0.0.0
the target is reachable: false
Test failed
Exception
21 matches
Mail list logo
