On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:12:46 GMT, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>> This is an adaptation of a patch originally written by Shafi Ahmad in
>> a comment on the JBS page but never submitted or merged.
>>
>> With -Xcheck:jni, the method java.net.NetworkInterface.getAll very
>> quickly breaches the default
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:41:21 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Please hold off on this; there's an issue to clear up.
Done.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2963
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:01:02 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Jonathan Dowland has updated the pull request incrementally with two
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Correct test invocation metadata
>>
>>-Xcheck:jni prior to the main class declaration; /othervm suffix no
On 29/06/2020 17:06, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> It's a possibility. IMHO, it doesn't really make the code easier to
> read, though. Some duplication for clarity seems OK to me in this case.
> I'm not too fond of over-use of ifdef so I'd rather keep it at v5.
> YMMV.
;
> Thoughts?
OK.
--
Andrew Haley (he/him)
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
https://keybase.io/andrewhaley
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/9/23 Andrew Haley :
>> Christopher Hegarty -Sun Microsystems Ireland wrote:
>>> [cc'ing net-dev]
>>>
>>> I see you have push access, so if you make the appropriate changes
>>> (mentioned above) I can review the w
Christopher Hegarty -Sun Microsystems Ireland wrote:
> [cc'ing net-dev]
>
> Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> two-lines patch for regression test
>>> java/net/MulticastSocket/SetOutgoingIf.java is exposed at
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptisnovs/JTReg_SetOutgoinIf/
>
