On 4/11/2021 12:14 am, Pavel Rappo wrote:
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 16:30:56 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
This PR follows up one of the recent PRs, where I used a non-canonical modifier
order. Since the problem was noticed [^1], why not to address it en masse?
As far as I remember, the first mass-canoni
On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:11:31 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find here a trivial cleanup change that updates classes in the
> `java.net.http` module to use the "blessed modifier order".
>
> The changeset was obtained by running `sh ./bin/blessed-modifier-order.sh
> src/java.net.http
On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:11:31 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find here a trivial cleanup change that updates classes in the
> `java.net.http` module to use the "blessed modifier order".
>
> The changeset was obtained by running `sh ./bin/blessed-modifier-order.sh
> src/java.net.http
Hi Mark,
On 03/11/2021 14:30, Mark Sheppard wrote:
a general comment on the static abstract class changes to abstract static
class. For me the former and current declarations seems more appropriate, that
is, static abstract class, as the static modifier immediately conveys a
significant and
On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:11:31 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find here a trivial cleanup change that updates classes in the
> `java.net.http` module to use the "blessed modifier order".
>
> The changeset was obtained by running `sh ./bin/blessed-modifier-order.sh
> src/java.net.http
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 16:30:56 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
> This PR follows up one of the recent PRs, where I used a non-canonical
> modifier order. Since the problem was noticed [^1], why not to address it en
> masse?
>
> As far as I remember, the first mass-canonicalization of modifiers took place
On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:11:31 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find here a trivial cleanup change that updates classes in the
> `java.net.http` module to use the "blessed modifier order".
>
> The changeset was obtained by running `sh ./bin/blessed-modifier-order.sh
> src/java.net.http
> This change implements a new service provider interface for host name and
> address resolution, so that java.net.InetAddress API can make use of
> resolvers other than the platform's built-in resolver.
>
> The following API classes are added to `java.net.spi` package to facilitate
> this:
> -
> This change implements a new service provider interface for host name and
> address resolution, so that java.net.InetAddress API can make use of
> resolvers other than the platform's built-in resolver.
>
> The following API classes are added to `java.net.spi` package to facilitate
> this:
> -
On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:11:31 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find here a trivial cleanup change that updates classes in the
> `java.net.http` module to use the "blessed modifier order".
>
> The changeset was obtained by running `sh ./bin/blessed-modifier-order.sh
> src/java.net.http
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 20:34:44 GMT, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>>> Pragmatically, fix the script to ignore those keywords on comment lines.
>>> Learn Perl, its just a regular expression pattern match and replace
>>> expression.
>>
>> I understand in principle how to modify that script to ignore doc c
Hi,
Please find here a trivial cleanup change that updates classes in the
`java.net.http` module to use the "blessed modifier order".
The changeset was obtained by running `sh ./bin/blessed-modifier-order.sh
src/java.net.http`.
best regards,
-- daniel
-
Commit messages:
- 8276
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 16:30:56 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
> This PR follows up one of the recent PRs, where I used a non-canonical
> modifier order. Since the problem was noticed [^1], why not to address it en
> masse?
>
> As far as I remember, the first mass-canonicalization of modifiers took place
13 matches
Mail list logo
