On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 01:15:25 GMT, Clive Verghese wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for the feedback.
>
> I have verified that tier1 and tier2 tests pass on Windows, MacOS and Linux.
Thank you! I will address the closed test failures. I will post you when the
update is ready.
-
PR: htt
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:55:40 GMT, Julia Boes wrote:
> This change clarifies the InetSocketAddress::toString specification, which
> was recently updated to reflect an implementation change [1]. The
> specification is not changed, but it is enhanced with two examples and some
> more verbiage, as
Hi Jaikiran,
I just created a PR, taking into consideration your suggestion:
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/2357
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2021-February/015298.html
Regards,
Julia
From: net-dev on behalf of Jaikiran Pai
Date: Tuesday, 2 February 2021 at 15:06
To: C
This change clarifies the InetSocketAddress::toString specification, which was
recently updated to reflect an implementation change [1]. The specification is
not changed, but it is enhanced with two examples and some more verbiage, as
per earlier suggestions on the net-dev mailing list [2][3].
Hello Chris,
I missed this thread previously. This suggested change to the javadoc
looks good to me and the example now makes it clear on what to expect.
As for the last paragraph of the javadoc, I'm just adding to the
suggestions already made by others in this thread. Perhaps the following
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 12:27:08 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my proposed change for JDK-8235140: '`Investigate
> deprecation of the Socket/ServerSocket impl factory mechanism`' ?
>
> This fix proposes to deprecate (for the eventual removal) the API points fo
Hi,
Could someone please review my proposed change for JDK-8235140: '`Investigate
deprecation of the Socket/ServerSocket impl factory mechanism`' ?
This fix proposes to deprecate (for the eventual removal) the API points for
statically configuring a system-wide factory for the `Socket/SocketSer
