8255675: Typo in java.net.HttpURLConnection
-
Commit messages:
- Merge pull request #1 from anupamdev20/JDK-8255675
- 8255675: Typo in java.net.HttpURLConnection
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1250/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=1250&ra
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 05:02:07 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> The test com/sun/jndi/dns/ConfigTests/PortUnreachable.java is not working on
>> AIX.
>>
>> It tests that when a DNS server is unreachable it fails quickly with a
>> PortUnreachableException due to ICMP Destination Unreachable packets
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:33:58 GMT, Jie Fu wrote:
>> Christoph Langer has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains one commit:
>>
>> Test jdk/com/sun/jndi/dns/ConfigTests/PortUnreachable.java does not work
>> on AIX
>
> test/j
> The test com/sun/jndi/dns/ConfigTests/PortUnreachable.java is not working on
> AIX.
>
> It tests that when a DNS server is unreachable it fails quickly with a
> PortUnreachableException due to ICMP Destination Unreachable packets received
> and not having to wait for the full timeout interval
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:28:08 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> The test com/sun/jndi/dns/ConfigTests/PortUnreachable.java is not working on
> AIX.
>
> It tests that when a DNS server is unreachable it fails quickly with a
> PortUnreachableException due to ICMP Destination Unreachable packets rece
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:54:18 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could someone please review our code for JDK-8252304: 'Seed an
>> HttpRequest.Builder from an existing HttpRequest'?
>>
>> This RFR proposes a new factory method for creating a new `HttpRequest`
>> builder from an existi
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 17:16:21 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/HttpRequestNewBuilderTest.java line 171:
>>
>>> 169: while (iter1.hasNext() && iter2.hasNext())
>>> 170: assertEquals(iter1.next(), iter2.next());
>>> 171: }
>>
>> This code doesn't see
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review our code for JDK-8252304: 'Seed an
> HttpRequest.Builder from an existing HttpRequest'?
>
> This RFR proposes a new factory method for creating a new `HttpRequest`
> builder from an existing `HttpRequest`.
> This method can be used to build a new request eq
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:42:02 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Michael McMahon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional
>> comm
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:29:26 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> Minor spec changes from spec approved in initial CSR
>
> Michael McMahon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
> brought in by the merge/
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:32:28 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> The clarification to the SecurityException looks good.
>
> The API docs specify that bind(null) will "bind to an automatically assigned
> socket address". Would it be better to lead with that phrase in the
> properties doc rather than swi
> Minor spec changes from spec approved in initial CSR
Michael McMahon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional
commits since th
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review our code for JDK-8252304: 'Seed an
> HttpRequest.Builder from an existing HttpRequest'?
>
> This RFR proposes a new factory method for creating a new `HttpRequest`
> builder from an existing `HttpRequest`.
> This method can be used to build a new request eq
13 matches
Mail list logo
