Hi Alan.
On 26/03/2020 17:29, Alan Bateman wrote:
NetworkConfiguration.isTestable - is the hardcoded check for "awdl"
needed? I don't think I've seen it with non-link local address so I
can't tell if it is needed. I'm
It might no longer be needed, but we know that awdl is always
the wrong cho
On 26/03/2020 15:36, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi,
Please find below a fix for:
8241336: Some java.net tests failed with NoRouteToHostException on
MacOS with special network configuration
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241336
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_82413
With this update, the logic looks like: if TLSv1.3 is not enabled in the
SSLContext, use TLSv1.2 instead; Otherwise, use TLSv1.3 and TLSv1.2.
There may be a couple of issues:
1. TLSv1.2 may be not enabled, although TLSv1.3 is enabled.
For example:
System.setProperty("jdk.tls.client.protocols
I think you should mark one of the two bugs a duplicate. Typically I
mark the more recent one as a duplicate, unless there is a good reason
to do otherwise.
--Sean
On 3/26/20 12:28 PM, Sean Mullan wrote:
Cross-posting to security-dev as this involves TLS/SSL configuration.
--Sean
On 3/26/20
Cross-posting to security-dev as this involves TLS/SSL configuration.
--Sean
On 3/26/20 10:02 AM, rahul.r.ya...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello,
Request to have my fix reviewed for issues:
JDK-8239595 : ssl context version is not respected
JDK-8239594 : jdk.tls.client.protocols is not respe
Hi,
Please find below a fix for:
8241336: Some java.net tests failed with NoRouteToHostException on
MacOS with special network configuration
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241336
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8241336/webrev.01/index.html
The crux of the i
LGTM.
-Chris
> On 26 Mar 2020, at 14:32, Julia Boes wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review this small fix of a recently pushed test? The
> option to extend the policy file has to be 'java.security.policy' instead of
> 'policy' - this was discussed on this mailing list but then mira
Thanks for jumping on this Julia!
Reviewed. Since this is making some noise in the CI I suggest
to push it asap.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 26/03/2020 14:32, Julia Boes wrote:
Hi,
Could someone please review this small fix of a recently pushed test?
The option to extend the policy file has
Hi,
Could someone please review this small fix of a recently pushed test?
The option to extend the policy file has to be 'java.security.policy'
instead of 'policy' - this was discussed on this mailing list but then
miraculously ignored by myself...
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/
Hello,
Request to have my fix reviewed for issues:
JDK-8239595 : ssl context version is not respected
JDK-8239594 : jdk.tls.client.protocols is not respected
The fix updates
jdk.internal.net.http.HttpClientImpl.getDefaultParams(SSLContext ctx)
to use ctx.getDefaultSSLParameters()instea
10 matches
Mail list logo
