On 18/12/2019 16:47, Chris Hegarty wrote:
:
Specifically on this point, the two-arg variants of `joinGroup` and
`leaveGroup` throw an UnsupportedOperationException if invoked on a
MulticastSocket that has a DatagramSocketImpl which was compiled against
a pre-1.4 version of the DSI interface. ( th
> On 18 Dec 2019, at 13:14, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
>
> … because MulticastSocket can't work with a DatagramSocketImpl that hasn't
> been upgraded.
Specifically on this point, the two-arg variants of `joinGroup` and
`leaveGroup` throw an UnsupportedOperationException if invoked on a
Multicast
On 18/12/2019 16:06, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Not withstanding the various different post-close behaviour of the
methods of DatagramSocket ( throw IOException, silently ignore, return a
default value, return last known value ), I think that it would be best
to clarify the specification with the exist
> On 18 Dec 2019, at 11:09, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> On 18/12/2019 10:55, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> We already have two implementations of DatagramSocket: one is the plain
>> DatagramSocket, the other is the DatagramSocket adapter created by
>> DatagramChannel::socket.
>>
>> Even without preparin
DatagramSocket and MulticastSocket delegate to a DatagramSocketImpl, a
provider-like mechanism that dates from early JDK releases. I'm
wondering if anyone is aware of any implementations and whether they are
still maintained. The context for asking is whether anyone would notice
if the JDK d
On 18/12/2019 10:55, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
We already have two implementations of DatagramSocket: one is the plain
DatagramSocket, the other is the DatagramSocket adapter created by
DatagramChannel::socket.
Even without preparing for DatagramSocket reimplementation this
is a step forward in homoge
Hi Alan,
On 18/12/2019 11:01, Alan Bateman wrote:
I guess my point here is that UncheckedIOException will never be thrown,
which might be okay if the primary motive is to prepare DatagramSocket
for the new implementation.
We already have two implementations of DatagramSocket: one is the plain
On 17/12/2019 14:35, Patrick Concannon wrote:
Hi,
Could someone please review my fix and CSR for issue JDK-8235783
'DatagramSocket::disconnect should allow an implementation to throw
UncheckedIOException'?
DatagramChannel's connect and disconnect methods throw an IOException
while DatagramS
