> On Dec 12, 2019, at 8:23 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> By default transparent authentication is disabled on windows.
> You may have to specify a non-default value for the
> jdk.http.ntlm.transparentAuth property [1], or configure
> an Authenticator [2] that has the appropriate credent
Hi,
By default transparent authentication is disabled on windows.
You may have to specify a non-default value for the
jdk.http.ntlm.transparentAuth property [1], or configure
an Authenticator [2] that has the appropriate credentials.
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225506
[2]
http
> On 11 Dec 2019, at 17:35, Julien Royer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On 11 Dec 2019, at 10:48, Michael McMahon
>> wrote:
>> Go ahead and file a bug and we can take it from there.
>>
> Thank you Michael.
>
> > Bug Report Submission Complete
> > Thank you for taking the time to provide us with your
Hi,
> On 11 Dec 2019, at 10:48, Michael McMahon
> wrote:
> Go ahead and file a bug and we can take it from there.
>
Thank you Michael.
> Bug Report Submission Complete
> Thank you for taking the time to provide us with your details.
> We will review your report and have assigned it an internal
Hi Aleksei,
Thanks for the feedback. I had thought about it but felt that it might be
better to leave as much business logic to Java vs native as possible as a
general principle. But if it makes more sense to do it native here happy to
make the change :)
Thanks,
- Anuraag
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019, 0
Hi Anuraag,
The webrev with the latest patch can be viewed here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/anuraaga/7006496/02
Thanks for replacing FirstDnsSuffix usages with DnsSuffix. I've double
checked it with native application and can confirm that on my test host
(Microsoft Windows Server 2016
Hi Behrang,
net-dev is a better list to discuss networking/http related topics.
On 03/12/2019 12:22, Behrang Saeedzadeh wrote:> Hi all,
>
> Are there any plans to implement a "multipart/form-data" BodyPublisher in
> Java 14 or later?
There are no plans - especially not for 14 since we will be
Hi,
I think I agree that the spec is not completely clear on this point.
While it doesn't explicitly say
that attributes are per-exchange, it does kind of imply that. My
preference would be to tighten
up the spec; make clear what is normative (the current behavior) and
distinguish from that
w
