Hi Brend,
I don't want remove all code related to scope_id assignation because it can
break compatibility with old software, the new code only allows unicast packets
be routed by the OS. I couldn't find the reason to exists of that (old) code.
Linux has a filesystem than allow to applications
Hello,
Is this really correct? This seems to break for multi-homed hosts (old and new
code). Does OS X not do proper interface autoselection (and if so, would the
naive approach be any good?).
Shouldnt it at least try to look at the destination routes, the priorities and
the lifetimes?
Gruss
On 11/04/18 15:44, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi Joel,
Sounds good to me then. I created a webrev and uploaded it:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8200719.0/
I will run it through the tests here at SAP and check the results.
I will run it through the test system here in Oracle too.
Hi Joel,
Sounds good to me then. I created a webrev and uploaded it:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8200719.0/
I will run it through the tests here at SAP and check the results.
@All: Could we please get another review?
Thanks
Christoph
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel
Hi Christoph,
OS X has a issue that needs "always" add a sin6_scope_id a multicast packet, I
check that exists a old issue that logged it and add that piece of code:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7144274
The DefaultInterface class in OS X is a plain Java class that list all
interfa
Thanks Chris , As you suggested, I will provide the patch based on jdk 11.
Thanks,
Srividya S
From: "Langer, Christoph"
To: Srividya Shamaiah , Chris Hegarty
Cc: OpenJDK Network Dev list
Date: 11/04/2018 02:51 PM
Subject:RE: 8169865 : Changes not ported to IP
Hi Joel,
your fix sounds reasonable. In fact, I'm not even sure if the sin6_scope_id
should be set for multicast. Maybe it should be done only for link local
addresses.
Additionally, I guess the selection of the default interface (for IPv6) should
be improved because I still can imagine a scen
Hi Srividya,
I would also welcome this fix.
Will you do the fix based on the jdk (11) depot? I think
Java_java_net_Inet4AddressImpl_getLocalHostName should then be exactly the same
as Java_java_net_Inet6AddressImpl_getLocalHostName. I can assist you with
sponsoring/backporting to JDK8, if you
Thank you Chris for opening the JIRA bug, I will work on the fix and
contribute it .
Thanks,
Srividya S
From: Chris Hegarty
To: Srividya Shamaiah
Cc: OpenJDK Network Dev list
Date: 10/04/2018 08:51 PM
Subject:Re: 8169865 : Changes not ported to IPv4
> On 10 Apr 2018,
