[JDK-8016521] IPV6 address selection

2016-04-12 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hello, a while back I brought up the discussion that there is no preferIPV6=system (or similar) setting which allows to turn off the reordering of address families by Java. Because only the OS can try to correctly do target address determinaton. A Bug was opened and it was excluded from Java 8 -

Re: RFR JDK-8153353: HPACK implementation

2016-04-12 Thread Pavel Rappo
> On 12 Apr 2016, at 19:47, Chris Hegarty wrote: > >>> On 12 Apr 2016, at 16:56, Roger Riggs wrote: >>> >>> Since you have a TestHelper class you could put it there and not duplicate >>> the code in several tests. >> >> Thanks! Done. >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8153353/webrev.0

Re: RFR JDK-8153353: HPACK implementation

2016-04-12 Thread Chris Hegarty
On 12 Apr 2016, at 17:51, Pavel Rappo wrote: > >> On 12 Apr 2016, at 16:56, Roger Riggs wrote: >> >> Since you have a TestHelper class you could put it there and not duplicate >> the code in several tests. > > Thanks! Done. > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8153353/webrev.00/test/java

Re: RFR JDK-8153353: HPACK implementation

2016-04-12 Thread Pavel Rappo
> On 12 Apr 2016, at 16:56, Roger Riggs wrote: > > Since you have a TestHelper class you could put it there and not duplicate > the code in several tests. Thanks! Done. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8153353/webrev.00/test/java/net/httpclient/http2/java.httpclient/sun/net/httpclient/hpack

Re: RFR JDK-8153353: HPACK implementation

2016-04-12 Thread Roger Riggs
Hi Pavel, On 4/12/2016 10:36 AM, Pavel Rappo wrote: Hi Roger, thanks for looking into this! Changes are done in-place. It saves hunting around if you provide the link. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8153353/webrev.00/ Do you think issues marked as [*] could be addressed incrementally a

Re: RFR JDK-8153353: HPACK implementation

2016-04-12 Thread Pavel Rappo
Hi Roger, thanks for looking into this! Changes are done in-place. Do you think issues marked as [*] could be addressed incrementally after the initial push? > On 11 Apr 2016, at 16:18, Roger Riggs wrote: > > Hi Pavel, > > Though this is an implementation only package, it could use a few mor